Orwell Award Announcement SusanOhanian.Org Home

Data Command Force


136 in the collection  

    70,000 Ways to Classify Ailments
    Ohanian Comment: Under a new federally mandated system, the number of diagnostic codes doctors must use to get paid is expanding from 14,000 to 70,000. Here are a few examples of how complete this system is:

  • Y92253 Opera house as the place of occurrence of the external cause

  • V9540XA Unspecified spacecraft accident injuring occupant, initial encounter

  • W5803XA Crushed by alligator, initial encounter

  • W2202XA Walked into lamppost, initial encounter

  • W2202XD Walked into lamppost, subsequent encounter

  • W2202XS Walked into lamppost, sequela

  • Apparently no activity is free from danger: Y93D1 Activity: knitting and crocheting

    And each code gets much more specific:

    T63811A Toxic effect of contact with venomous frog, accidental (unintentional), initial encounter

    T63811D Toxic effect of contact with venomous frog, accidental (unintentional), subsequent encounter

    T63811S Toxic effect of contact with venomous frog, accidental (unintentional), sequela
    T63812A Toxic effect of contact with venomous frog, intentional self-harm, initial encounter

    T63812D Toxic effect of contact with venomous frog, intentional self-harm, subsequent encounter

    T63812S Toxic effect of contact with venomous frog, intentional self-harm, sequela

    T63813A Toxic effect of contact with venomous frog, assault, initial encounter

    T63813D Toxic effect of contact with venomous frog, assault, subsequent encounter

    T63813S Toxic effect of contact with venomous frog, assault, sequela

    T63814A Toxic effect of contact with venomous frog, undetermined, initial encounter

    My real concern here is how this massive coding will appear in schools.

    Certainly this code is needed: Schoolroom as the place of occurrence of the external cause.

    Just imagine the detailed codes needed for a preschoolers failure to score 'proficient' on kindergarten readiness tests:

    IC63811A Toxic effect of contact with venomous initial consonant, accidental (unintentional), initial encounter

    IC63811D Toxic effect of contact with venomous initial consonant, accidental (unintentional), subsequent encounter

    IC63811S Toxic effect of contact with venomous initial consonant, accidental (unintentional), sequela

    IC63812A Toxic effect of contact with venomous initial consonant, intentional teacher-afflicted initial encounter

    IC63812D Toxic effect of contact with venomous initial consonant, intentional teacher-afflicted, subsequent encounter

    The coding will follow the child. Forever.

    Encounters with Common Core-recommended nonfiction texts need to be documented:

    English/Language Arts Literacy Examples ELA-1 and ELA--2: Focused Literacy, Extended Constructed Response Type, p. 684
    Example #5
    Analyze the concept of mass based on a close reading of Gordon Kane's "The Mystery of Mass" and cite specific textual evidence from the text to answer the question of why particles have mass at all. Students explain important distinctions the author makes regarding the Higgs field and the Higgs boson and their relationship to the concept of mass.

    Coding for the effects of this requirement must be much more specific than those for alligator encounters.

    The new medical codes are specific enough to code "Person on outside of dune buggy injured in traffic accident, initial encounter (V8623XA)" but are still opague on learning difficulties:

    809 Developmental disorder of speech and language, unspecified
    F8189 Other developmental disorders of scholastic skills

    Prediction: ed biz entrepreneurs will find gold in coding hazardous schoolhouse encounters. There's plenty of room for documentation of specific behavior disorders caused by encounters with Common Core.

    By Melinda Beck

    Doctors, hospitals and insurers are bracing for possible disruptions on Oct. 1 when the U.S. health-care system switches to a massive new set of codes for describing illnesses and injuries.

    Under the new system, cardiologists will have not one but 845 codes for angioplasty. Dermatologists will need to specify which of eight kinds of acne a patient has. Gastroenterologists who don't know what's causing a patient's stomachache will be asked to specify where the pain is and what other symptoms are present--gas? eructation (belching)?--since there is a separate code for each.

    In all, the number of diagnostic codes doctors must use to get paid is expanding from 14,000 to 70,000 in the latest version of the International Classification of Diseases, or ICD-10. A separate set of ICD-10 procedure codes for hospitals is also expanding, from 4,000 to 72,000.

    Hospitals and physician practices have spent billions of dollars on training programs, boot camps, apps, flashcards and practice drills to prepare for the conversion, which has been postponed three times since the original date in 2011.

    Some coding experts warn that claims denials could double as providers and payers get used to the new, more specific codes.

    Others are more sanguine. "We're hoping it will be like Y2K," when the switch to 2000 dates was expected to crash computers world-wide, says Robert Wergin, president of the American Academy of Family Physicians. "Everybody will worry, and the claims will go through fine."

    The real upshot won't be apparent immediately. "Any problems that crop up will be far more evident on Oct. 15 than Oct. 1, because it takes that long to process claims," says William Rogers, an emergency physician who is the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Service's ombudsman for ICD-10 conversion.

    ICD codes are an international system for recording diseases, injuries and other conditions set by the World Health Organization; federal agencies developed the far more elaborate version for the U.S. To get paid, doctors submit such diagnosis codes along with separate procedure codes that describe the service performed. Private and government insurers scrutinize the ICD codes to judge whether the service was medically necessary.

    The new coding system is needed, many health-care experts say, because modern medicine has outgrown the old one, adopted in the U.S. in 1979. The ICD-9 doesn't differentiate between Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes, for example, or distinguish Ebola from "other diseases spread by viruses."

    ICD-10 will help researchers better identify public-health problems, manage diseases and evaluate outcomes, proponents say. Over time, it will create a much more detailed body of data about patients' health--conveying a wealth of information in a single seven-digit code--and pave the way for changes in reimbursement as the nation moves toward value-based payment plans.

    "A clinician whose practice is filled with diabetic patients with multiple complications ought to get paid more for keeping them healthy than a clinician treating mostly cheerleaders," says Dr. Rogers. "ICD-10 will give us the precision to do that."

    The multitude of codes for external causes of injuries have gotten most of the attention to date. Hurt in a prison swimming pool? That's Y92.146. Crushed by a human stampede while resting or sleeping? That's W52.04. But insurers and Medicare officials say that, in most cases, they won't require doctors to include such external-cause information for billing, although it is useful for research purposes.

    Clinicians will need to document enough detail about patients' conditions to support the new codes, including what side of the body is affected, how severe the problem is and whether it has occurred before.

    ICD-10 also offers different codes for ailments depending on myriad circumstances, such as whether respiratory diseases are due to tobacco use and whether obesity is due to consuming excess calories or some other reason. In many cases, doctors readily know such information; in other cases, it could require more discussion and longer visits.

    Medicare officials say they won't deny claims solely for lack of specificity for the first 12 months, as long as providers supply the correct general category of illness. But that doesn't apply to hospital procedure codes, and most commercial insurers aren't offering such a grace period.

    To what extent insurers will require doctors to use the most specific codes, or use them to adjust reimbursement rates, isn't clear. "In the first few months, the goal is simply to get the ICD-10 codes into the system and make sure providers are using them," says Clare Krusing, a spokeswoman for the America's Health Insurance Plans.

    Cost estimates for the ICD-conversion vary widely. Dueling studies have estimated the cost from less than $10,000 to more than $225,000 for small practices. Some large hospitals systems say they have spent millions on training and other preparations.

    âThis affects literally every single system in a hospital, except maybe the cafeteria,â says Ed Hock, managing director of revenue cycle solutions for the Advisory Board Co., a consulting firm that has warned its hospital clients to expect their accounts-receivable days to increase by three to five, on average. âThat can mean millions of dollars in cash flow.â

    ICD-10 codes will affect Medicare payments for some conditions because the added specificity moves them to a different severity tier, which changes how they are reimbursed. For example, in ICD-9, there is only one code for hepatic encephalopathy, a severe brain disorder that can occur with liver failure, which is considered a major complication. ICD-10 asks whether the patient is in a coma and if not, the condition is downgraded to a regular complication and the hospital is paid, on average, $2,800 less, according to an analysis by the Advisory Board.

    But ICD-10 does give providers and health plans a chance to increase payments by recording patientsâ conditions in more detail. In Medicare Advantage and other plans that receive per-member, per-month fees to provide care, payments are adjusted to reflect the severity of patient illnesses, so the more secondary diagnoses providers record, the more they may be paid.

    âHospitals leave millions of dollars on the table today through incomplete documentation or coding errors,â says Mr. Hock. âThereâs a revenue opportunity in doing this right.â

    Some patients will be affected, too. Those getting regular tests or infusions at outpatient centers will need to bring new orders bearing ICD-10 codes starting Oct. 1, says Kevin Lenahan, chief financial officer at Atlantic Health Systems, which owns five hospitals in New Jersey.

    Atlantic plans to have personnel armed with ICD-10 code books stationed at every registration desk that day. âWe wonât turn patients away. Weâll either call their doctor, covert the code for them or, in the worst case, weâll put the bills on hold until we get the right information,â says Mr. Lenahan.

    Insurers will have to work with both ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes for months or years until all the claims for tests, treatments and doctor visits before Oct. 1 are cleared. âIf someone had a service in August that doesnât get billed until December, that will still have an ICD-9 code,â says Debra Cotter, director of ICD-10 implementation for Pittsburgh-based Highmark Inc. Insurers generally give patients two years to submit out-of-network claims. âIf someone has stashed a bill in a shoebox, it might be a year or more before they realize theyâre owed some money,â Ms. Cotter says.

    — Melinda Beck with Ohanian comment
    Wall Street Journal
    October 01, 2015

    Index of Data Command Force

Pages: 6   
[1] 2 3 4 5 6 Next >>    Last >>

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of education issues vital to a democracy. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information click here. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.