Orwell Award Announcement SusanOhanian.Org Home

CPS standardized testing program is excessive and experimental, and just how expensive?

NOTE: Sharon Schmidt's testimony was featured by Sam Smith in Undernews--Progressive Review, the most consistently smart political commentary out there.

Teachers should go forth and do likewise. Ask the school board about excessive and abusive testing. Demand to know how much is being spent on excessive testing.

Wowser, Sharon! Kudos.

Reader Comment: Sharon Schmidt is supported by new U of C report

The new U of C report that cam out this morning I think effectively supports Sharon's point. The report can be read in full here.

Effectively the researchers stated that the massive standardized test score data as presented by CPS for years gave a false picture of progress. Because of the differences in the various tests administered using a measurement of meeting or not meeting standards CPS lost sight of actual achievement and believed progress was being made when it was not for most students.

You can disagree with U of C in why this lack of progress took place because they blame teachers to a degree, but the fact that the measurement system became a joke is hard to argue with. The only one really defending the idea that real academic progress has been made is Paul Vallas who attacked the U of C report. Duncan seems to be laying low.

by Sharon Schmidt

With the intention of alerting the public to the problems with the CPS testing program and to obtain Board financial information, this reporter spoke at the September 28, 2011, Chicago Board of Education meeting.

The following are my prepared remarks, which I read, along with some of the dialogue that followed with Board president David Vitale.

Good morning. My name is Sharon Schmidt. I am the editor of Substance, the Chicago newspaper that covers public education. I am a step-parent of a Chicago public high school graduate. My husband and I have two children who attend a Chicago public elementary school. I am a high school teacher and the chairperson of the Chicago Teachers Union testing committee.

I am here on behalf of the CTU testing committee, but before I speak about testing I am going to make a suggestion about these board meetings. Why not hold the meetings during after school hours in the neighborhoods at schools with large auditoriums and free parking?

It is very difficult for people to attend these downtown meetings during the workday. Many more parents and teachers would like to be here, but can't take the day off. In addition, the seats are limited here. Right now there are dozens of people who did come here this morning to attend the meeting, but since there is not enough space here they're sitting in a room on the 15th floor watching this on a video screen.

Why don't you hold the board meetings as they used to be -- in the schools, after school -- so that more people could attend? How does that sound?

Vitale said something non-committal. I added, "In the past, they were every other month -- sometimes here sometimes in the schools." Then I continued with my prepared remarks.

Now I'm going to speak about the problems with the CPS testing program, which can be categorized under three main headings:

  • excessive,

  • experimental, and

  • expensive.

  • CPS is administering an excessive number of tests. Not only are you using the federal and state required tests, ACCESS for English Language Learners, the multi-test ISAT, the EXPLORE, PLAN, ACT and Work Keys (which you administer to high school students several times each year) there are other series of tests you administer multiple times a year to students, from pre-K through 12th grade. The Kindergarten Readiness Test, mClass math, DIBELS, Scantron Performance Series are common from pre-K through 9th grade, but in some schools you administer even more, such as benchmark assessments, KLT, MAP, Riverside Achieve Data, Step, and additional area-created, 5-week assessments. Our students are bombarded with tests, multiple times a year.

    You're experimenting with our children, administering test after test, obsessively gathering data. But our children are not lab mice or test tube specimen. Extracting data hurts them. Each test takes away from academic, social, and emotional learning that they should be getting in school. The tests stifle their curiosity and love of learning. Then you harm our children with your overemphasis on test scores (which are just comparisons with other children) giving our children two odious choices: "I'm better than others," or "I'm worse than others." Of course your testing experiment hits our most disadvantaged students the hardest. You test our poorest students in segregated schools the most.

    Now here's my question. We know the testing program is excessive, we know it's experimental, we know it's unnecessary, but how expensive is it? How much is CPS paying for testing this year?

    Following the presentation there was a long, silent pause. No one spoke for 11 seconds. The Board members, Cheif Executive Officer Jean Claude Bizzard, and other administrators just stared at this reporter.

    Finally, I spoke again:

    "We have a freedom of information request to Cassandra Daniels, and we would like to know how much we are spending on testing."

    Vitale responded by saying the FOIA would be answered. He added that I had made a lot of "wild accusations" without any statistics.

    "Okay, here's a statistic," I said. "A kid, an average kid, by the time he hits 8th grade is going to take more than 100 tests."

    "My daughter is in elementary school and she's taking tests every day and it isn't a problem," Vitale said. "I don't know what you're talking about."

    "I'm not talking about teacher-produced tests," this reporter said. "I am a teacher. I assess my students regularly. I create tests on the unit that we are covering. Those are good tests. Those tests go back to my students. They can learn what they haven't gotten. They can see how they did, see if they are mastering the curriculum. I'm talking about corporate-produced tests -- the Scantron Performance Series tests, the various iterations of the Riverside test. There are so many new tests. I just talked to a principal this morning. In addition to the tri-yearly, multiple-test Scantron Performance Series tests, he just heard from his Area that he needs to do a quarterly test. What is the point?"

    Vitale mentioned that CPS has an office of education and that he would talk to people there to try to find out, but it would be difficult to find the information.

    "Oh my goodness," I said. "Ask the teachers. We have asked the teachers. In our committee we have surveyed delegates in every school in Chicago: 'How many tests are you giving in your schools?' Find out what is going on in the different schools in the system. I would hope that would be among your first jobs: Find out what is going on in each school. Some of these kids, with the primary grade DIBELS tests, they're taking them every two weeks."

    "Thank you," Vitale said.

    "You're welcome," I said.

    — Sharon Schmidt





    This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of education issues vital to a democracy. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information click here. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.