Orwell Award Announcement SusanOhanian.Org Home

Eva Moskowitz’s Success Academy Schools network rolling in money but still wants 50% increase in management fees from state

Read--and see--longtime teacher activist Norm Scott's account of this outrage here

Ohanian Comment: So the rich get richer, as one of New York City's wealthiest charter school operators is expected to be approved for a 50% increase in per-pupil management fees. And in the media, only Juan Gonzalez seems to care. I had a personal encounter with the infamous Eva Moskowitz when both of us spoke on a panel at a Queens College conference.

She rudely and publicly dissed my message about my daily note exchange with my students, a practice I continue to regard as my best teacher practice.

Reader Comment: It cannot be overstated the extent and degree to which the neverending Bloomberg regime has systematically, even ritually, destroyed the fabric of our once-great New York City Public Schools for the express purpose of opening a market for pushy charlatans like Moskowitz. She feeds at the public trough, and is supremely arrogant about how much she deserves it based on nothing but her unmitigated gall and her connections to the minions of the ultra-rich. It also grieves me that, except for Juan Gonzalez, the billionaire-funded media drones are willingly assisting their sugar-daddies in leading those of us who live paycheck to paycheck in a ruined economy of their making to the cliff's edge. The schools are an ungodly mess because that is the plan. Eva is crafty enough to be on the front lines of the army of carpetbaggers who are champing at the bit until it's their turn to feed. If you have any decency in you, you are appalled.

Reader Comment: Meanwhile at my children's public school we're losing our library and toilet paper and napkins have to be carefully rationed. Why is there no public outcry about wasted tax dollars when the rich get subsidized?

by Juan Gonzalez

Even in public education, the rich keep getting richer.

That's the message the trustees of the State University of New York will send Monday when they vote to approve a huge 50% increase in the per-pupil management fee of one of the city's wealthiest, biggest-spending and most controversial charter school operators.

The Success Academy Charter Schools Inc., run by former City Councilwoman Eva Moskowitz, applied in April for an increase from $1,350 to $2,000 in the annual per student payment it receives from the state to run 10 of its charter schools.

SUNY postponed the vote following a public outcry over the agency's failure to disclose any details beforehand.

Not until Friday morning did the agency finally release some documents to justify the increase.

Among them is a May 22 letter from Moskowitz that claims her network has been heavily subsidizing "shortfalls" in its management costs for years through outside donations and grants.

Those high costs have been a result, Moskowitz said, of a "quality and intensity of services that is far higher than nearly any other (charter operator) in New York City," yet she has continued to augment her services despite insufficient fees from the schools.

But with the "deficit ... increasing every year," Moskowitz says, "the current situation is simply unsustainable." In 2010-11 alone, she states, her network's "shortfall" reached $4.7 million.

This will all come as a huge surprise to anyone who has bothered to examine Success Academy's financial reports or who has witnessed firsthand its almost limitless spending .

The Success Network, in fact, is a fund-raising colossus, having received $28 million from dozens of foundations and wealthy investors the past six years, and millions more in state and federal grants.

On its annual tax forms, it has continually reported huge year-end surpluses for both itself and its individual schools. Those combined surpluses currently stand at more $23.5 million.

Hardly the picture of financial woe.

Last year alone, the network spent an astounding $883,119 on "student recruitment" - much of it for glossy flyers mailed to hundreds of thousands of parents; bus stop and Internet ads and an army of paid recruiters to go door-to-door soliciting student applications.

Even other charter schools rarely spend more than a few thousand dollars on student recruitment.

Meanwhile, Moskowitz's network spent another $1.3 million on what it described as "network events and community outreach."

It paid $243,150 to SKD Knickerbocker, a high-powered public relations firm, to supplement its own in-house press people, and another $129,000 to a Washington consulting firm founded by President Obama's chief strategist David Axelrod.

But that wasn't all that Success Academy spent on marketing itself.

The network's first seven schools incurred an additional $912,000 "student recruitment" expenditure last year, most of it going to big advertising and branding companies.

That's comes to more than $3.4 million spent on marketing and drumming up huge numbers of application forms - in just one year.

It is perhaps the most intense campaign to sell a group of charter schools in the history of education.

"Our results prove we are spending resources effectively," Moskowitz said. "With fewer taxpayer dollars than district schools, we have an extraordinary level of student achievement, which is why we have 13,000 applicants this year."

Which, of course, ignores the fact there is no need to spend so many millions of dollars to recruit 10 times more applicants than you can possibly handle.

As for the Success Academy's "extraordinary level of student achievement," that will be the subject of a future column.

For now, despite efforts from parent groups led by New York Communities for Change, SUNY's bureaucrats seems poised to give Moskowitz exactly what she wants - a big fee increase to overcome her "unsustainable shortfall."

— Juan Gonzalez
New York Daily News





This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of education issues vital to a democracy. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information click here. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.