Orwell Award Announcement SusanOhanian.Org Home


Chicago Strike and the Corporate Attack on Education


Ohanian Comment; Connecting what's going on in Chicago to corporate America is critical. So far this press release has resulted in requests for four radio interviews. . . progressive radio, not NPR.

NOTE: I would like to point out I am the co-author of Why Is Corporate America Bashing Our Public Schools? The book grew out of Kathy Emery's research and she is the co-author. I rarely make this correction in interviews because the important thing is to get the phrase "Corporate
America bashing out public schools" out there.


Institute for Public Accuracy

Author of Why Is Corporate America Bashing Our Public Schools? Susan Ohanian said today: "The current corporate-driven assault on public education rises from the late 1980s when Arkansas governor Bill Clinton held hands with IBM CEO Lou Gerstner to forge America 2000 for President Bush the Elder. That policy, which came directly from a Business Roundtable template, has morphed into Goals 2000, NCLB [No Child Left Behind] and now Race to the Top and the Common Core Standards, the latter whose initial development and promotion was paid for by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and which brings us the national test which President Bill Clinton wanted so badly but never got."

That was the home page. Here's what readers got if they punched 'more.'.

HENRY GIROUX [email]
Giroux holds a chair professorship at McMaster University in Canada at the English and Cultural Studies Department. His books include Critical Pedagogy and Education and the Crisis of Public Values. He just wrote the piece: âOn the Significance of the Chicago Teachers Strike: Challenging Democracyâs Demise.â

SUSAN OHANIAN
Author of Why Is Corporate America Bashing Our Public Schools? Ohanian said today: âThe current corporate-driven assault on public education rises from the late 1980s when Arkansas governor Bill Clinton held hands with IBM CEO Lou Gerstner to forge America 2000 for President Bush the Elder. That policy, which came directly from a Business Roundtable template, has morphed into Goals 2000, NCLB [No Child Left Behind] and now Race to the Top and the Common Core Standards, the latter whose initial development and promotion was paid for by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and which brings us the national test which President Bill Clinton wanted so badly but never got. . . .

âOfficially, the only thing teachers can strike against is money. But teachers care a lot more about policies â about things that harm kids â than they do about pay raises. Until Chicago, theyâve never been allowed to protest class size, inadequate curriculum, lack of libraries, racist closure of neighborhood schools, and so on. The Chicago union has ignored these rules.

âI bet Randi Weingarten [president of the American Federation of Teachers] is just as nervous as Rahm Emanuel â and just as anxious for this strike to be settled. If it continues, sheâs in trouble. And so is NEA. I think teachers across the country will feel, if Chicago can do it, so can we.

âWhat Chicago needs, and teachers across the country need, is for this strike to continue. The union has been so smart about getting community backing. Iâd hate to see them cave. I worry they are under pressure to âprotect Obama.â This strike puts him in a terrible position, and if they can claim victory now and go back to work, it seems to let him off the hook â at least temporarily. But it will be a terrible loss.â Ohanian wrote the piece âââRace to the Topâ and the Bill Gates Connectionâ for FAIRâs magazine, Extra!

PAULINE LIPMAN [email]
Professor of educational policy studies at the College of Education at the University of Illinois-Chicago, Lipman is author of The New Political Economy of Urban Education Neoliberalism, Race, and the Right to the City. She said today: âThe Chicago Teachers union is in a pivotal battle with Mayor Rahm Emanuel and his appointed Board of Education, comprised of bankers, CEOs, and real estate magnates. As the strike enters its second week, it is clear that this strike is a pivotal battle for the future of public education, not only in Chicago, but in the U.S.

âAfter more than a decade of the punishing effects of top-down accountability, disinvestment in and closing of neighborhood schools, degradation of teaching and learning, and the expansion of charter schools, teachers have had enough. The CTU is pushing for smaller class sizes, more social workers and counselors, a rich curriculum for all students, fair teacher evaluation, recall of fired teachers due to school closings, and fair compensation. But at the heart of their demands is resistance to the whole corporate education agenda of testing, privatization, and union busting that is undermining public education in the U.S.

âThis is why the stand by Chicago teachers and their union leadership has electrified teachers and parents nationally. It is not clear who will win the stand-off in Chicago, Rahm Emanuel and the powerful corporate education âreformersâ or the teachers. But, as the Chicago Sun Times pointed out, the CTU has already won a lot. They have forged a unified, mobilized, and courageous union of rank and file teachers and paraprofessionals. Through the strike, teachers have emerged as organizers and activists. There is a new solidarity between teachers and the parents and students. They have put the degradation of public education on the front page and defined an authentic education reform agenda. The strike has crystallized an education movement in Chicago that is lighting a fire nationally.â

— News Release
Institute for Public Accuracy

2012-09-17

http://www.accuracy.org/release/chicago-strike-and-the-corporate-attack-on-education/

na


MORE OUTRAGES


FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of education issues vital to a democracy. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information click here. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.