Pearson and the Atlanta School Mess
Each of these schools used what Pearson Achievement Solutions calls its "School Progress Professional Development Program," which Pearson describes as a...
As part of the program, "Pearson Achievement Solutions delivers professional development throughout the year in many forms, including teacher coaching and mentoring, lesson modeling, faculty study groups, school-based workshops, and online resources. Checkpoints [italics added] are built into the process to ensure consistent progress in achieving school improvement goals."
This document claims that as a result of "Pearson Achievement Solutions' proven diagnostic tools, data-driven planning, and research-based professional development, APS has achieved measurable, school-wide improvements in the quality of classroom instruction. All schools have shown improvement in Mathematics and Reading/English Language Arts on Georgia's Criterion-Referenced Competency Test (CRCT)."
Overall, student scores at the Pearson Achievement Solutions Schools -- Grove Park, Dunbar, Centennial, Beecher Hills, CW Hill, East Lake, FL Stanton, and Walter White -- rose from 74.5% of the Grades 3, 4, and 5 students meeting or exceeding standards on the Mathematics exam in 2004 to 82.2% in 2006, and in Reading/English Language Arts went from 78.75% in 2004 to 86.3% in 2005 and back to 79.3% in 2006. Pearson Achievement Solutions attributed the slight declines in 2006 to the introduction of new standards.
The Pearson Achievement Solutions document highlights Grove Park Elementary School with 520 pre-kindergarten to grade five students.
On the Mathematics exam, the percentage of students in Grades 3, 4, and 5 meeting or exceeding standards at Grove Park School rose from 68% in 2004 to 77.1% in 2006 although the percentage of students meeting or exceeding standards on the Reading/English Language Arts remained flat at 70%.
Pearson also recognized Paul Laurence Dunbar Elementary, East Lake Elementary School, and Walter White Elementary School in Atlanta as Pearson Achievement Solutions National Demonstration Schools for 2006-07.
At Dunbar the percentage of students in Grades 3, 4, and 5 meeting or exceeding standards on the Mathematics exam rose from 61% in 2004 to 73.4% in 2005 to 71.6% in 2006 and in Reading/English Language Arts from 64% in 2004 to 75.9% in 2005 and back to 70.6% in 2006.
At East Lake the percentage of students in Grades 3, 4, and 5 meeting or exceeding standards on the Mathematics exam rose from 72% in 2004 to 91% in 2005 to 98% in 2006 and in Reading/English Language Arts from 76% in 2004 to 97.5% in 2005 and back to 91.3% in 2006.
At Walter White the percentage of students in Grades 3, 4, and 5 meeting or exceeding standards on the Mathematics exam rose from 70% in 2004 to 77.1% in 2005 to 77.9% in 2006 and in Reading/English Language Arts from 78% in 2004 to 83.5% in 2005 and back to 80.2% in 2006.
The 2011 Georgia Criminal investigation report that led to the recent indictments gives a somewhat different explanation for the surprisingly high improvement in test scores at these schools. Investigators found the level of cheating at Grove Park to be "moderate." Two teachers confessed to changing student answers; however the principal seemed to be unaware of it. At East Lake the cheating was described as "severe." Investigators charged that the school Principal and testing coordinator "directed efforts including changing answers and arranging easier tests for some students, the report says." The principal also "threatened retaliation against teachers who 'slandered' her to investigators." One teacher charged that the principal told the staff to "do whatever we have to do, even if it means breaking the rules." Both the principal and testing coordinator denied the allegations, the principal claiming that "all erasures were done by students."
At White Elementary cheating was also found to be "severe." "Teachers were accused of giving answers to students and correcting CRCT answer sheets."
Again, I want to make very clear that I am not accusing Pearson or any of the other testing and tutorial companies marketing their products to the Atlanta school system of cheating on these exams. But given their involvement in these schools and the promotion of their products based on data they reported from the Atlanta school system, there is much they have to answer for. If they want to continue marketing their high stakes tests, tutorials, and curriculum packages to United States schools, they have an obligation to explain their role.
For example, how did Pearson, which claims to have checkpoints "built into the process to ensure consistent progress in achieving school improvement goals," attempt to establish the validity of the Atlanta school district's claims for off-the-charts improvement on test scores before taking credit for the results? I would also like to know why the Pearson Achievement Solutions website was down for updating while the indictments were being released and whether any material was deleted.
Figure missing here can be seen at Huffington Post.
Otherwise, I recommend that the federal government, states, localities, and school districts place a moratorium on all further business dealings with Pearson and the other companies marketing high stakes tests, tutorials, and curriculum packages in American schools. I also recommend they look into suspending current contracts until there is full disclosure.
There is a national debate going on about the value of high stakes tests such as the ones designed and marketed by Pearson and these other companies. In an earlier post, I gave Pearson permission to reproduce my blogs on own their websites as part of this debate. This would afford them the opportunity to provide an extended response to my views. I also proposed that in the interest of expanding the discussion about education an agent for Pearson write a response to my concerns and we post them on Huffington as a joint blog.
In response to my email, Susan Aspey, Vice President of Media Relations for Pearson Public Affairs, wrote "The draft post is, in our opinion, a thinly veiled attempt to connect Pearson with the cheating scandal in the Atlanta Public Schools." She continued, "While we do not intend to rebut each of Mr. Singer's points in his current draft, we would like to make it clear that we categorically reject Mr. Singer's insinuations about Pearson and the Atlanta Public Schools. Mr. Singer notes multiple times in his post that Pearson was not the creator of the tests in question, but then goes on to demand accountability from Pearson for our work in Georgia. Pearson works with many states and schools districts across the country, including some schools in Atlanta. We are honored to serve these schools and look forward to maintaining a productive relationship with educators in Atlanta."
While Ms. Aspey did not address my questions about the checkpoints supposedly "built into the process to ensure consistent progress in achieving school improvement goals" or why the Pearson Achievement Solutions website was down for updating while the indictments were being released, I do welcome the opportunity to discuss my concerns about Pearson Educational with company representatives
FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of education issues vital to a democracy. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information click here. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.