Orwell Award Announcement SusanOhanian.Org Home


Teacher Knows if You’ve Done the E-Reading


There were a lot of comments from outraged people, pointing to Big Brother and civil rights issues. Here are some others that brought up other issues.

Reader Comment; I'm a well educated and well rounded person who recently took a class at the local community college for fun one evening a week. The class used a similar sort of 'smart' online textbook. The school required use of it, and it was obvious the professor had mixed feelings. According to the program, I'm a horrible student with under developed study habits. Once the professor came to me with this (fully realizing this wasn't the case) I played around a little and figured out how to game the program. Suddenly I had great study habits with minimal effort. The problem? I took paper notes, didn't clink on the 'further information' links because I generally knew that information already, and printed things out (which apparently counts against you).

At the end of the class, I realized why. The day after the class ended, all online content, notes, etc vanished. The whole thing was just a ploy to make money for the text book manufacturer. It forces students to do everything online and pushes professors to encourage it under the guise of 'improving their student's engagement'. A good professor should be able to tell via class discussions if their students did readings and understood the material.

Reader Comment: How long before the whiz kids in the computer science department make an app that reads and highlights your e-textbook for you?

Reader Comment: I teach music at a community college and use a text that is available on CourseSmart, and I will never use it with my classes again. Why? It costs as much as the print version, but the students don't actually own the book. This saves the publisher from the horrors of the secondary market, but it also means that students don't have a copy that they can keep on their shelves as reference for future classes. This is problematic in your major coursework if you need to review .

A music appreciation class should involve listening to the entire piece being studied, yet the homework site does not give the students the whole piece (only links to iTunes where they'd have to drop several hundred more dollars in addition to the site access to complete the collection). It's impossible to students to learn Beethoven's 5th if the homework only has them listen to snippets as short as 5 seconds long.

That, and the homework site itself is stupidly easy to cheat--just don't email the results to your instructor until you've got a perfect score. Scores went down on the homework, but understanding went back up when I switched away from this site to paper--that's harder to game.


By David Streitfeld

SAN ANTONIO â Several Texas A&M professors know something that generations of teachers could only hope to guess: whether students are reading their textbooks.

They know when students are skipping pages, failing to highlight significant passages, not bothering to take notes -- or simply not opening the book at all.

"It's Big Brother, sort of, but with a good intent," said Tracy Hurley, the dean of the school of business.

The faculty members here are neither clairvoyant nor peering over shoulders. They, along with colleagues at eight other colleges, are testing technology from a Silicon Valley start-up, CourseSmart, that allows them to track their studentsâ progress with digital textbooks.

Major publishers in higher education have already been collecting data from millions of students who use their digital materials. But CourseSmart goes further by individually packaging for each professor information on all the students in a class -- a bold effort that is already beginning to affect how teachers present material and how students respond to it, even as critics question how well it measures learning. The plan is to introduce the program broadly this fall.

Adrian Guardia, a Texas A&M instructor in management, took notice the other day of a student who was apparently doing well. His quiz grades were solid, and so was what CourseSmart calls his "engagement index." But Mr. Guardia also saw something else: that the student had opened his textbook only once.

"It was one of those aha moments," said Mr. Guardia, who is tracking 70 students in three classes. "Are you really learning if you only open the book the night before the test? I knew I had to reach out to him to discuss his studying habits."

Students do not see their engagement indexes unless a professor shows them, but they know the books are watching them. For a few, merely hearing the number is a shock. Charles Tejeda got a C on the last quiz, but the real revelation that he is struggling was a low CourseSmart index.

"They caught me," said Mr. Tejeda, 43. He has two jobs and three children, and can study only late at night. "Maybe I need to focus more," he said.

CourseSmart is owned by Pearson, McGraw-Hill and other major publishers, which see an opportunity to cement their dominance in digital textbooks by offering administrators and faculty a constant stream of data about how students are doing.

In the old days, teachers knew if students understood the course from the expressions on their faces. Now some classes, including one of Mr. Guardiaâs, are entirely virtual. Engagement information could give the colleges early warning about which students might flunk out, while more broadly letting teachers know if the whole class is falling behind.

Eventually, the data will flow back to the publishers, to help prepare new editions.

Academic and popular publishers, as well as some authors, have dreamed for years of such feedback to direct sales and editorial efforts more efficiently. Amazon and Barnes & Noble are presumed to be collecting a trove of data from readers, although they decline to say what, if anything, they will do with it.

The predigital era, when writers wrote and publishers published without a clue, is seen as an amazingly ignorant time. "Before this, the publisher never knew if Chapter 3 was even looked at," said Sean Devine, CourseSmart's chief executive.

More than 3.5 million students and educators use CourseSmart textbooks and are already generating reams of data about Chapter 3. Among the colleges experimenting this semester are Clemson, Central Carolina Technical College and Stony Brook University, as well as Texas A&M-San Antonio, a new offshoot.

Texas A&M has one of the highest four-year graduation rates in the state, but only half the students make it out in that time. "If CourseSmart offers to hook it up to every class, we wouldn't decline," said Dr. Hurley, the dean.

At a recent session here of a management training class, Mr. Guardia addressed how to intervene efficiently with underperformers. The students watched a video of a print shop manager chewing out an employee without knowing the circumstances. The moral: The manager needed better data.

Then Mr. Guardia discussed with his students the analytics of their own reading, which he had e-mailed to them. The students suggested that once again better information was needed. Several said their score was being minimized because they took notes on paper.

Others complained there were software bugs, a response Mr. Guardia has heard before. The student who was cramming at the last minute said, for example, that he had opened the textbook several times, not just once. Perhaps these are the digital equivalent of "the dog ate my homework." CourseSmart said it knew of no problems with its software.

The start-up said its surveys indicated few privacy concerns among students or colleges, and this was borne out by the class. "Big Brother," said one student, but that was a joke, and everyone snickered. Being watched is a fundamental part of the world they live in.

"Amazon has such a footprint on me," said Carol Johnson, 51, who works in the tech industry. "It knows more than my mother."

Chris Dede, a professor of learning technologies at Harvard's Graduate School of Education, is more apprehensive. He believes analytics are important in the classroom, but they must be based on high-quality data.

The CourseSmart system has other potential problems; students could easily game the highlighting or note-taking functions. Or a student might improve his score by leaving his textbook open and doing something else.

"The possibilities of harm are tremendous if teachers are naïve enough to think these scores mean anything for the vast majority of students," Professor Dede said.

CourseSmart says the data it collects now is a beginning. "Weâll ultimately show how the student traverses the book," Mr. Devine said. "There's a correlation and causality between engagement and success."

There is also correlation, the students are learning, between perception and success.

Hillary Torres, a senior, is a good student with a low engagement index, probably because she is taking notes into a computer file not being tracked. This could be a problem; she is a member of the Society for Human Resource Management, whose local chapter is advised by Mr. Guardia. "If he looks and sees, 'Hillary is not really reading as much as I thought,' does that give him a negative image of me?" she wondered. "His opinion really matters. Maybe I need to change my study habits."

After two months of using the system, Mr. Guardia is coming to some conclusions of his own. His students generally are scoring well on quizzes and assignments. In the old days, that might have reassured him. But their engagement indexes are low.

"Maybe the course is too easy and I need to challenge them a bit more," Mr. Guardia said. "Or maybe the textbooks are not as good as I thought."

— David Streitfeld
New York Times

2013-04-09

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/09/technology/coursesmart-e-textbooks-track-students-progress-for-teachers.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

na


MORE OUTRAGES


FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of education issues vital to a democracy. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information click here. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.