Orwell Award Announcement SusanOhanian.Org Home

New 'reform' could leave chicken poop on your dinner plate

A federal proposal to replace inspectors at chicken factories could have some horrifying consequences.

Ohanian Comment: I'm still exploring all the parallels with education deform. So what's the ed deform equivalent of chicken poop on the dinner plate? "Reform" in the chicken inspection industry is all about the number of chickens that can move down the line each minute. In ed reform, it's all about the number of kindergartners that can be brought into line for digital record keeping.

Think about the ed reform corresponding mandate(s) to assuming all birds need a heavy lathering of chemicals--so inspections are unnecessary.

New job possibilities for Harvard grads at loose ends after their European tour and before law school: Chicken inspectors.

This piece ends with this observation: "The White House and USDA have just ignored everybody."

Teachers can certainly say "Been there, had that done to us."

Watch out for the chicken poop--on your dinner plate and in your classroom.

By Josh Eidelson

Consumer and labor activists are staging a White House protest this afternoon over a federal proposal to replace inspectors at poultry factories, which they charge will mean more injured workers -- and more chicken poop on Americans' dinner plates.

"This is a gift to the industry," said Food & Water Watch senior lobbyist Tony Corbo, who's been fighting the proposed regulatory change since it was first floated under the Clinton administration. "The Obama administration has not hidden the fact that based on their analysis, over a three-year period the government is going to save $90 million by eliminating some 800 positions in these poultry factories," and industry coffers are âgoing to increase on an annual average of $260 million, because theyâre going to be able to put more product in the choppers."

The White House and USDA did not respond to early morning requests for comment. In a press release announcing the formal introduction of the proposed rule change last year, Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack said, "The new inspection system will reduce the risk of airborne illness by focusing [Food Safety and Inspection Service] inspection activities on those tasks that advance our core mission of food safety. By revising current procedures and removing outdated regulatory requirements that do not help combat foodborne illness, the result will be a more efficient and effective use of taxpayer dollars."

A Government Accountability Office study released this month found "questions about the validity" of USDA's conclusion that the new approach would better prevent the spread of salmonella. Critics charge that by replacing most USDA inspectors at chicken plants with company employees, the USDA plan would increase health risks for Americans who eat chicken, and that by increasing (to 175) the number of chickens that can move down the line each minute, the administration is guaranteeing more workers will be permanently injured.

Rather than each USDA inspector checking 35 birds a minute, said Corbo, under the proposed change a USDA inspector at the end of the line would be checking three per second. "I don't care how good you are," said Corbo. "You're not going to see anything." Corbo told Salon that company-paid inspectors would lack the training of USDA inspectors, and he said that data from a Freedom of Information Act request showed that in plants that were piloting the proposed change, "the company-paid employees were missing a lot of the so-called 'defects,' including visible fecal contamination on the carcasses."

"Poultry is an extremely dangerous occupation, one of the most dangerous occupations in the U.S...." said Anne Janks, an organizer with Interfaith Worker Justice. "You increase the speed, and you're going to have more injuries." Janks added that what could be "most devastating" to workers wasn't the additional at-work amputations, but the long-term effects of stepped-up repetitive motion and chemical use.

Janks told Salon that workers at factories where the new rule was being piloted were already reporting instead skin and breathing issues due to increased use of chemicals to replace more stringent inspections. "Instead of inspecting and trying to remove contamination, it's just, we're going to assume contamination and use chemicals on every bird ..." said Janks. "It may mask the presence of E. coli or salmonella without eradicating it" before it reaches consumers.

"The White House and USDA," said Janks, "have just ignored everybody."

— Josh Eidelson with Ohanian comment





This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of education issues vital to a democracy. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information click here. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.