Friedman Turns Baltimore Uprising Into Commercial for Wife's Charter School
Ohanian Note: For those keeping track of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, between 2010 and 2013, it awarded the SEED Foundation $525,970.
One reader comment featured as a New York Times "pick" thanks Tom for such a thoughtful column; another "pick" calls it a truly inspiring story.
Other "picks" pointed out that "Of the 80 who won the lottery that day in 2008, only 29 stuck it out or made it from sixth grade to graduation"
A Times Pick Recommended by 118 Readers: A costly secondary program that lost 63% of it's students would not warrant national attention, but it led me to this thought experiment:
What would the results be if two small public secondary schools in a Baltimore neighborhood received an influx of money equal to the amount spent on the 80 SEED students with the proviso they had to develop a 24/7 wraparound program for their students? And what would the newspaper accounts of that program be if only 36% of the student population graduated?
Concerned Citizen wrote: Despite these lux benefits, 51 kids dropped out -- the vast majority, more than 2/3rds. That isn't success. That is a hideous, embarrassing failure. That lefty liberalism sees this as "success" is what is truly pathetic.
Reader Comment: Just to put a little more perspective on the numbers . . . 29 out of the 80 graduated. There are 85,000 children in the Baltimore City Public School System.
Reader Comment: SEED Message 1: The only way that black kids can be successful is by removing them from their families, homes and neighborhoods.
SEED Message 2: Only with that plus a ton of money spent on them, only 1 in 3 will make it.
How does that help African Americans in Baltimore? Really?
Reader Comment: This is lazy journalism. The real story to tell here is about the 64% of the kids who didn't graduate. But that means getting off your butt and tracking them down which takes a good deal more effort than going to the graduation with your wife. Whether reporting from Hong Kong, or the middle east, this is the Friedman way. Go to fancy restaurants for interviews with well positioned academics, but never, never go out on the street. Doesn't even bother to tell us what the graduation rate is at the public school. The Times' editors need to monitor Tom and little closer, find him a pair of jeans, and send him outside.
by Adam Johnson
Today putative liberal and mustachioed wonker Thomas Friedman (>a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/03/opinion/thomas-l-friedman-planting-seeds-in-baltimore.html?_r=0"> Planting Seeds in Baltimore New York Times, 6/3/15) did what he does best: take something vaguely topical and use it as a hook to promote whatever topic he and his billionaire friends want to propagandize that week.
Whether it's advocating collective punishment of Ukrainians to push his CEO friend's Green Energy IPO during its quiet period, or unironically floating the idea of arming ISIS to demagogue Iran, itĂ˘€™s a tried and true formula for AmericaĂ˘€™s most tedious Important Person.
This morning, however, Friedman reached a new low, exploiting the Baltimore Uprising to run a rather shameless commercial for his wifeĂ˘€™s charter school organization:
On a warm Saturday in late May 2008, my wife, Ann, talked me into going to an auditorium in Baltimore to watch a lottery. It was no ordinary lottery. Numbered balls were cranked out of a bingo machine, and the winners got a ticket to a better life. It was the lottery to choose the first 80 students to attend a new public college-prep boarding school: the SEED School of Maryland based in Baltimore. ( My wife chairs the foundation behind the SEED schools.) SEED Maryland -- SEED already had a branch in the District of Columbia -- was admitting boys and girls from some of the toughest streets and dysfunctional schools in Maryland, and particularly Baltimore, beginning in sixth grade. Five days a week, they would live at the school in a dormitory with counselors -- insulated from the turmoil of their neighborhoods -- and take buses home on weekends. Last Saturday, I attended the graduation of that first class.
Put another way: Friedman used the most influential media space in the world to run a totally pointless commercial for his wife's charter school. And it's OK, because he disclosed the commercial. Sort ofĂ˘€”he doesn't mention that the SEED Foundation lists
him and his wife jointly as a million-dollar-plus contributor.
Ann Friedman, previously Ann Bucksbaum, is an heir to a massive multi-billion-dollar real estate empire
. She and Thomas occupy a $9.3 million mansion
in south Connecticut. Like virtually all major charter school backers
, they are filthy rich do-goody white people who know what's best for inner-city youth, in this case those of Baltimore. This is swell as far as it goes--but what does this type of pointless self-promotion have to do with anything? Ah, right, we have to shoehorn in the recent uprising in Baltimore to promote this stale brand of boot-strap neoliberalism.
Right away, Friedman paints the image of the type of PR pablum we've grown accustomed to with charter schools' slick PR packaging: "Numbered balls were cranked out of a bingo machine, and the winners got a ticket to a better life." Anyone who saw Waiting for Superman
knows the dramatic image.
There;s only one problem: These public lotteries are--and always have been--little more than cynical PR spectacles not required by law, nor serving any purpose other than promotion. This is why they're largely no longer used by charter schools. As Cynthia McCabe of the NEA noted
The National Alliance for Public Charter Schools in documents advising its member schools states that it "and charter support organizations around the country strongly recommend that schools publicize their lotteries to demonstrate the strong popularity of charter schools." In a section explaining why these public events are a "wonderful opportunity," the first benefit given is to "draw media attention to the demand for high-quality charters." The document goes on to specify everything from microphone to snack availability ("Families will be more likely to attend if you can present them with reasons that entice them"). It advises announcers on what to say when a name is pulled in the lottery. "'Selected' is preferable to 'winning.'" For the vast majority of attendees who will go home without their number having been pulled, NAPCS suggests sending them a thank you letter for attending and "wish them the very best."
In other words, the whole exercise is a gratuitous marketing ploy. Or as Friedman's New York Times
colleague Gail Collins put it
Charter schools, please, stop. I had no idea you selected your kids with a piece of performance art that makes the losers go home feeling like they're on a Train to Failure at age 6. You can do better. Use the postal system.
The point of these lottery spectacles is to paint the image of demand: If something is this "selective," it must therefore be valuable. Like Friedman's column, they're neoliberal agitprop designed to tug at our heartstrings while promoting a radical right-wing privatization agenda
. And like FriedmanĂ˘€™s column, theyĂ˘€™re entirely superfluous. Again, one is compelled to ask: What does any of this have to do with a series of protests and "riots" resulting from a murdered black youth?
The piece reaches peak whitesplaining when pro-charter school Secretary of Education Arne Duncan chimes in and parrots the pernicious tripe that the Baltimore Uprising was the result of "absent fathers":
I asked Education Secretary Arne Duncan what he thought generally about the public boarding school model, which is expensive. He said, "Some kids need six hours a day, some nine, some 12 to 13," but some clearly would benefit from a more "24/7" school/community environment. "I went to Baltimore and talked to teachers after the riots," Duncan added. "The number of kids living with no family member is stunning. But who is there 24/7? The gangs. At a certain point, you need love and structure, and either traditional societal institutions provide that or somebody else does. We get outcompeted by the gangs, who are there every day on those corners." So quality public boarding schools need to be "part of a portfolio of options for kids."
The not-so-subtle implication here: Absent black parents caused the "riots." Not legitimate outrage. Not the brutal killing of a black youth. Not the subsequent lack of an investigation. Not the decades of rampant police abuse. But absent fathers and the catch-all of gangs. This is the type of centrist racist dog-whistling one would expect from the man who once said Hurricane Katrina was good for New Orleans
because it led to more charter schools.
If only more kids could be funneled into the boarding schools of benevolent billionaires--who, incidentally, get massive tax breaks for running these programs--all would be well with the black community. If only they could educate their way out being targeted by racist police. If only we can keep seeding the Friedmans' pet projects, we would never need to unearth the sprawling, deeply ingrained roots of racism.
Adam Johnson is a freelance journalist; formerly he was a founder of the hardware startup Brightbox. You can follow him on Twitterat @AdamJohnsonNYC.
Adam Johnson plus Readerco mments
FAIR: Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting