Orwell Award Announcement SusanOhanian.Org Home

Brainteaser: Scientists Dissect Mystery of Genius

Kay's Comment: Mystery of Genius? "... most of the brain's inner workings are still a mystery --- though perhaps not for long." Two medical doctors are "on the verge of refining imaging techniques to a point that would make traditional intelligence tests obsolete." They say how much gray matter matters and determining quantitative assessments of how much gray matter one has in every single area of the brain can be used to predict IQ. Somehow, IQ or intelligence has been left out of NCLB. As a veteran special educator, I know that some students with lower intellectual ability are never going to be reading, writing, and calculating on grade level by the magical year of 2014, and the punishments that come with that failure will not make these kids pass those required tests. Providing an appropriate educational plan for these students as required by IDEA has been redefined as finding a way to make them pass the tests so that schools do not get on the failure list and lose federal funding. Past, present, and future legislators of NCLB need to learn more about how brains really work.

by Sanjay Gupta

ALBUQUERQUE, New Mexico (CNN) -- A young man in a white physician's coat and a bow tie is walking toward us down the sidewalk, a plastic five-gallon bucket swinging from his hand.

"That must be our brain," I say to my producer.

We're at the Mental Illness and Neurodiscovery, or MIND, Institute, where they literally look inside the brain to try to spot creativity and genius. (Watch: Brain scans look for the secrets of genius -- 2:05)

The MIND Institute, an independent research site funded mostly with federal dollars, has perhaps the largest collection of sophisticated brain imaging devices in the world.

As a neurosurgeon, I don't normally slice brains open, right down the middle, so this will give me a different perspective.

With pathologist Robert Reichard and Rex Jung, a psychologist at the MIND Institute who studies creativity, we head to the dissection room.

When looking for creativity inside a human brain, the first thing you notice is -- nothing unusual.

Most scientists say that current brain imaging technology doesn't tell you much more.

"If I showed you two brains side by side, one with an IQ of 150, one with an IQ of 75, I can't tell the difference," says Jay Giedd of the National Institute of Mental Health, one of the most experienced researchers in the field.

But Jung and his colleague Dr. Richard Haier of the University of California, Irvine, claim they are on the verge of refining imaging techniques to a point that would make traditional intelligence tests obsolete.

"We can make quantitative assessments of how much gray matter they have in every single area, and we can use that to predict what their IQ might be," Haier says. "This is in the very early stage, and I think this is going to be very interesting."

Brain imaging remains in some ways as crude a tool as simply cutting open the brain and looking inside. Haier and Jung use magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to measure various parts of the brain. Then they compare the pictures to intelligence scores on a verbal or pen and paper test.

So far, says Haier, he has found a strong correlation between intelligence and the size and shape of certain brain structures -- including parts of the superior parietal lobe (involved in sensory perception) and parts of the prefrontal cortex (associated with complex thinking, personality, planning, coordination).

Intelligence research is full of surprises. For example, the brains of smarter people, as measured by IQ, tend to be less active but more efficient, Haier says.

In a controversial paper, he contends based on structural MRI scans that men and women think differently. For men in Haier's study, having more gray matter in certain areas corresponds to a higher IQ, while in women, it made no difference.

But with women, the amount of white matter in completely different areas is what corresponds to intelligence. (In both sexes, gray matter is made up of neurons that process information, while white matter is made of the neurons that connect different parts of the brain).

While men and women may use different brain pathways to think, Haier says their average IQ scores are not significantly different.

If confirmed and refined, the discovery could prove tremendously valuable to clinicians, including neurosurgeons.

"If a man and a woman both have a brain injury or a stroke at the same brain area, it could well be they have completely different effects," Haier says.

"Or think about Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimer's disease begins deep in the brain and moves forward to the frontal part of the brain. If the frontal part of the brain is more important for intelligence in women, as it seems to be, then it may be the symptoms of Alzheimer's disease are not apparent until later in the disease process."

If that scenario holds true, it means women risk a delay in getting treatment, unless the changes are captured through some kind of screening.

The MRI is only one of the MIND Institute's research tools. An MRI is static, like a photograph. It's about form, while functional MRI, positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) reveal the brain's functions.

The MEG scanner works like a rapid- exposure camera, snapping a thousand pictures each second of electrical activity pulsing through the brain and across its surface. You can actually see a thought unfold in real time.

While it happens in the blink of an eye, Haier and Jung say that in more intelligent persons, the process is faster still.

It is an amazing finding, but most of the brain's inner workings are still a mystery --- though perhaps not for long.

Genius has always been the domain of artists and philosophers, but today it is psychiatrists and neuroscientists who seem closest to finding its source -- even as the mind's secrets and the elusive touch of genius remain tantalizingly out of reach.

CNN's Caleb Hellerman contributed to this report.




This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of education issues vital to a democracy. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information click here. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.