Orwell Award Announcement SusanOhanian.Org Home


No Child Rule Sets New Low


Ohanian Comment:The institutional abuse of this child is hard to read. Well, of course, we can and must blame the U. S. Department of Education and all the corporate politicos who support that office. But why did school personnel agree to participate? It is long past time for us to ask this hard question of ourselves.

And why aren't the business people outraged by the flagrant waste of valuable resources it takes to administer the test?


By Ruth Sheehan

At age 9, Patti High has been profoundly affected by cerebral palsy
since birth. But make no mistake:

She is still subject to the state's End-of-Grade Tests.

Bound to a wheelchair, Patti cannot really sit up unassisted. She cannot
hold a fork and feed herself. She cannot converse in an easily
understandable fashion. She cannot read. She cannot write ... .

Let's put it this way: The list of "cannot's" is extensive.

But because she is, by some definition, a third-grader, she is compelled
to take the EOGs.

Don't blame the state, though. This particular bit of idiocy is courtesy
of the federal government and the No Child Left Behind law.

No Child makes sure every student is terrorized, er, included, when
standardized tests are given. It is well-intentioned, making sure
schools don't skirt testing requirements by exempting kids who struggle
in school.

But it's one thing to struggle. It's another to be profoundly disabled
from birth. Hence the grievous glitches.

Case in point:

One of the questions asked of Patti was: What is the area of a rectangle?

I am not making this up.

Patti's parents, who live near Wendell, learned at a meeting last fall
that their disabled daughter would be given the EOGs.

The teacher was in tears.

"We just laughed," said Cissy High, Patti's mom.

She was not overly worried about her daughter, who tends to ignore any
activities or conversations with which she does not wish to engage.

"I really thought, at most, that Patti would take the test and crumple
it up near her ear," said High. "She loves the music from infant toys,
and she loves any sort of crinkling sound."

To its credit, the school, Corinth-Holders Elementary in Johnston
County, tried to ease the pain. Patti's teacher wrote the multiple
choice answers to the EOG questions on individual flash cards. She would
read each question aloud, slowly, then present Patti with four or so
flash cards with the possible answers.

Whatever card Patti grabbed at was the answer the teacher filled in.

Because Patti only has partial use of her left arm, High suspects most
of her daughter's answers tended to be the nearest at hand, on the left.

"She knows maybe 30 to 35 words," High said. "And I use the term 'word'
loosely."

Patti has a vocabulary of her own, about the things that matter most to
her. Her family, her favorite foods and activities.

Grandma is "ganga"; swing is "ging."

Safe to say the area of a rectangle is neither one of Patti's interests
nor within her range of comprehension.

High said this is only the latest lunacy she and her family have
encountered in Patti's education. But No Child, in supposedly
maintaining standards, did manage to set a new low.

"I told the teacher and assistant principal at Patti's school that
whoever made that rule should have to come and administer the test,"
High said.

High originally planned to go to Patti's classroom and videotape the
testing session. But Patti was tested a few weeks earlier than the rest
of the school. Given the strict confidentiality employed in the EOGs,
taping probably wouldn't have been allowed.

And, in the end, it would have been too hard to watch.

— Ruth Sheehan
Raleigh News & Observer

2008-05-23

http://www.newsobserver.com/news/story/1082662.html

NC


MORE OUTRAGES


FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of education issues vital to a democracy. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information click here. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.