In a new futuristic Klein initiative, school happens via playlist
Ohanian Comment: You may recall some years ago I posted information on the Texas medical algorithm project, which offered scripts telling doctors what to do. If A exists, give pill B.
I recently visited a so-called alternative school where kids' academic needs were "diagnosed" by computers and then they sat in front of computers for their total curriculum delivery. It was a sterile, grim place, and I don't doubt that it is as these New York Standardistos claim "a glimpse into the future."
I hung around for half an hour or so--and didn't see any student interact with human--not a teacher, not another student.
Oh yes, every student's individual strengths and weaknesses can be calculated--if you define strength and weakness "skills" as items that are testable and scorable by a computer.
Joel Rose, called the "mastermind" of this scheme, was a Teach For America corps member in Houston, then an executive at Edison. A graduate of the Broad Superintendents Academy Class of 2006, he's now Chief Executive for Human Capital, New York City Department of Education.
The perfect resume for the perfect job title.
Human Capital: A measure of the economic value of an employee's skill set.
Who makes up these job titles?
Wouldn't you like to put the actual skill sets of some of these Standardistas out there for public scrutiny?
by Philissa Cramer
In one city classroom this summer, a computer algorithm is telling students what to do.
The classroom is actually a library at a Chinatown middle school with just 80 students, but school officials are hoping that it offers a glimpse into the future of the school system, one in which every studentĂ˘€™s individual strengths and weaknesses are calculated before each day is planned.
Students in the new pilot program, a $1 million effort that officials are calling the School of One, take a quiz every morning, and then receive a computer-generated schedule each morning, called a "playlist." A studentĂ˘€™s playlist might tell him to begin the day by meeting with a tutor, then to complete a set of online tasks, and then to work on a project with his classmates. The program, which focuses only on math instruction, will expand to three sites in January.
Schools Chancellor Joel Klein will roll out the program today, along with its mastermind, Joel Rose, who previously headed Edison Schools, the for-profit education management company now known as EdisonLearning. The announcement will mark one of the first initiatives of KleinĂ˘€™s administration that focuses on what happens inside classrooms since he unveiled citywide math and reading programs six years ago. That effort scripted moves down to how teachers should arrange their classrooms and the size of rugs.
The School of One project is based on the much different view that every student in the city should be taught a curriculum designed specifically for him or her, with technological innovations leading a transformation of the way teachers and students interact. Earlier this year, Klein told a New York Times columnist that he envisioned a school system where instruction was individualized by cutting down on the number of teachers and relying more on technology.
The School of One actually has a lower student-teacher ratio than typical middle school classrooms, with 10 students to every one adult. The summer pilot includes 80 rising seventh-graders from ManhattanĂ˘€™s MS 131 and, on the supervisory side, four teachers, four assistant teachers, and two high school interns, according to Will Havemann, a schools spokesman.
At the end of the summer, the department will test the students on 80 discrete math skills, and an independent group will assess the programĂ˘€™s effectiveness.
The department plans to open three School of One math programs in January, Havemann said. Expansion beyond that and into other subjects is dependent on the pilotĂ˘€™s success, he said. But he noted that most schools would not need any major structural changes before they could run a School of One program.
John Chubb, a fellow at the Hoover Institution and an executive at EdisonLearning whose new book Ă˘€śLiberating EducationĂ˘€ť lays out the vision for using technology to individualize instruction and lower the number of teachers, praised the School of One in an interview yesterday. But Chubb, who co-authored the book with Stanford professor Terry Moe, cautioned that itĂ˘€™s too early to decide whether the program is working.
Ă˘€śThere are lots and lots of people who are trying to figure out how to use technology to figure out its promise, which is to be able to meet the needs of students at their own pace,Ă˘€ť Chubb said. Ă˘€śThis is a very promising effort to try to do just that. How well it works out Ă˘€” who knows.Ă˘€ť