News Black-Out in DC: Pay No Attention to Those Veterans Chained to the White House Fence
Ohanian Commen: Although usually I limit posts on this site to education news, this news blackout is critical information to everybody. Our media likes to talk in sanctimonious terms about "controlled news" in China, North Korea, and so on, but in truth the US public has to go alternative sources to know what's going on. The New York Times leads the pack in deciding what is fit for the corporate agenda to print. FYI: Chris Hedges was foreign correspondent at the New York Times for 15 years and was part of the team of reporters there awarded the Pulitzer Prize for the paper's coverage of global terrorism. No major media reported on the demonstration of which he was a part--or on his arrest.
Hedges has a new book out, Death of the Liberal Class, in which he describes how the pillars of the liberal class--the press, universities, labor movement, culture, Democratic Party, and liberal religious institutions--have collapsed as effective counterweights to the corporate state. In its absence the needs of the poor, the working class and even the middle class, no longer have a champion.
Read on and see who else was involved.
by: Dave Lindorff
There was a black-out and a white-out Thursday and Friday as over a hundred US veterans opposed to US wars in Afghanistan and elsewhere around the world, and their civilian supporters, chained and tied themselves to the White House fence during an early snowstorm to say enough is enough.
Washington Police arrested 135 of the protesters, in what is being called the largest mass detention in recent years. Among those arrested were Ray McGovern, a former CIA analyst who used to provide the president's daily briefings, Daniel Ellsberg, who released the government's Pentagon Papers during the Nixon administration, and Chris Hedges, former war correspondent for the New York Times.
No major US news media reported on the demonstration or the arrests. It was blacked out of the New York Times, blacked out of the Philadelphia Inquirer, blacked out in the Los Angeles Times, blacked out of the Wall Street Journal, and even blacked out of the capital's local daily, the Washington Post, which apparently didn't even think it was a local story worth publishing.
Making the media cover-up of the protest all the more outrageous was the fact that most news media did report on Friday, the day after the protest, the results of the latest poll of American attitudes towards the Afghanistan War, an ABC/Washington Post Poll which found that 60% of Americans now feel that war has "not been worth it." That's a big increase from the 53% who said they opposed the war in July.
Clearly, any honest and professional journalist and editor would see a news link between such a poll result and an anti-war protest at the White House led, for the first time in recent memory, by a veterans organization, the group Veterans for Peace, in which veterans of the nationÃ¢€™s wars actually put themselves on the line to be arrested to protest a current war.
Friday was also the day that most news organizations were reporting on the much-touted, but also much over-rated Pentagon report on the "progress" of the American war in Afghanistan--a report prepared for the White House that claimed there was progress, but which was immediately contradicted by a CIA report that said the opposite. Again, any honest and professional journalist and editor would immediately see the publication of such a report as an appropriate occasion to mention the unusual opposition to the war by a group of veterans right outside the president's office.
And yet, the protest event was completely blacked out by the corporate news media. (Maybe the servile and over-paid White House press corps, ensconced in the press room inside the White House, didn't want to go out and brave the elements to cover the protest.)
If you wanted to know about this protest, you had to go to the internet and read the Huffington Post or to the Socialist Worker, OpEd News, or to this publication (okay, we're a day late, but I was stuck in traffic yesterday), or else to Democracy Now! on the alternative airways.
My old employer, the Sydney Morning Herald in Australia, showed how it's supposed to be done. In an article published Friday about the latest ABC/Washington Post Poll, reporter Simon Mann, after explaining that opposition to the war in the US was rising, then wrote:
The publication of the review coincided with anti-war protests held across the US, including one in Washington in which people chained themselves to the White House fence, leading to about 100 arrests.
That's the way journalism is supposed to be done. Relevant information that puts the day's news in some kind of useful context is supposed to be provided to readers, not hidden from them.
Clearly, in the US the corporate media perform a different function. ItÃ¢€™s called propaganda. And the handling of this dramatic protest by American veterans against the nationÃ¢€™s current war provides a dramatic illustration of how far the news industry and the journalism profession has converted itself from a Fourth Estate to a handmaiden to power. /./span>