Orwell Award Announcement SusanOhanian.Org Home


Obama bashes his own education policies


This appeared in Anthony Cody's Education Week Teacher blog, Living in Dialogue. Anthony is right: However you choose to interpret President Obama's remarks, you have to be dismayed.

Ohanian Comment: If you think Pres. Obama is actually advocating less standardized testing in the schools, take a look at what PARCC and SBAC, recipients of upwards of $350 million in federal dollars to develop new national tests, are planning: continuous testing.

Hello, President,
The smell of your baloney is evident to educators.

Reader Comment: Hello, Mr. President, Ummm, Are you lying or have you just not been paying attention??)

Reader Comment: Either he doesn't know what's going on or he's lying. Anyway, he lost my vote when he came to Florida and collaborated with Bill Gates.

Reader Comment: Sadly, I think Obama is just being political. I think he is reading the writing on the wall as to just how off target the whole standardized testing craze is, and realizing that, he is trying to back pedal without acknowledging the error of his administration.
I too, worked hard for Obama. I too, told my colleagues things would be different under his administration. I too, am sad, mad, disappointed, frustrated, and embarrassed by his policies that lack not only insight into the problems we face, unwillingness to seek out the truth of the problems we face, but also a lack of leadership.


by Anthony Cody

If only the Department of Education could hear this guy Obama, boy, they would have to rethink their approach!

In a town hall meeting hosted by Univision, President Obama was asked by a student named Luis Ayala if there could be a way to reduce the number of tests that students must take.

His answer was superficially reassuring, but underneath, rather alarming.

He replied:


"...We have piled on a lot of standardized tests on our kids. Now, there's nothing wrong with a standardized test being given occasionally just to give a baseline of where kids are at. Malia and Sasha, my two daughters, they just recently took a standardized test. But it wasn't a high-stakes test. It wasn't a test where they had to panic. I mean, they didn't even really know that they were going to take it ahead of time. They didn't study for it, they just went ahead and took it. And it was a tool to diagnose where they were strong, where they were weak, and what the teachers needed to emphasize.

"Too often what we've been doing is using these tests to punish students or to, in some cases, punish schools. And so what we've said is let's find a test that everybody agrees makes sense; let's apply it in a less pressured-packed atmosphere; let's figure out whether we have to do it every year or whether we can do it maybe every several years; and let's make sure that thatss not the only way we're judging whether a school is doing well.

"Because there are other criteria: What's the attendance rate? How are young people performing in terms of basic competency on projects? There are other ways of us measuring whether students are doing well or not."

Then he said something really radical.

"So what I want to do is -- one thing I never want to see happen is schools that are just teaching to the test. Because then you're not learning about the world; you're not learning about different cultures, you're not learning about science, you're not learning about math. All you're learning about is how to fill out a little bubble on an exam and the little tricks that you need to do in order to take a test. And that's not going to make education interesting to you. And young people do well in stuff that they're interested in. They're not going to do as well if it's boring."

I think I am going to see if President Obama would like to speak at the Save Our Schools rally we have planned this summer protesting his administration's policies!

But here is what is alarming. Either President Obama is trying to mislead people, or he is unfamiliar with the policies being advanced by his very own secretary of education, who was seated just a few feet away from him at this event. As someone who campaigned and raised money for Obama, I find both of these alternatives unacceptable.

Is President Obama aware:

  • that Race to the Top requires states to tie teacher pay and evaluations to student test scores? If ever there was a recipe for teaching to the test, this is it!


  • that his Secretary of Education is proposing to evaluate teacher preparation programs by tracking the test scores of the teachers they produce?


  • that his administration's plan for the new version of No Child Left Behind continues to place tremendous pressure on schools attended by the poorest students, ensuring that there will still be extremely high stakes attached to these tests? This creates the most invidious inequity of all -- where students most in need of the sort of wholistic, project-based curriculum the president rightly says is the cure to boredom remain stuck in schools forced to focus on test scores.


  • that his Department of Education is proposing greatly expanding both the number of subjects tested, and the frequency of tests, to enable us to measure the "value" each teacher adds to their students?


  • President Obama, I loved the way you described the role of assessment. It should be occasional, not punitive, and used to help diagnose where students need help. What Sasha and Malia are getting [at private Sidwell Friends School] is wonderful. Is there a way we could get your Department of Education's policies to align with your personal vision?

    — Anthony Cody
    Washington Post Answer Sheet

    2011-03-30

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/answer-sheet/post/obama_bashes_his_own_education_policies/2011/03/29/AFKbDlyB_blog.html?wpisrc=nl_cuzheads

    na


    MORE OUTRAGES


    FAIR USE NOTICE
    This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of education issues vital to a democracy. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information click here. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.