Orwell Award Announcement SusanOhanian.Org Home


[Susan notes: ]

Published in Education Week
01/21/2009
http://www.susanohanian.org/show_nclb_atrocities.html?id=2281

To the editor



Go here for a fine essay by Joseph Batory.



To the Editor:



I noted with interest, in your article "Spellings' Worldview: There's No Going Back on K-12 Accountability" (Dec. 10, 2008), that outgoing U.S. Secretary of Education Margaret Spellings was not sure, after all of her "success" with the No Child Left Behind Act, about her future plans. I have a suggestion: Ms. Spellings should work to transfer the federal law's "brilliance" to the business and corporate world, which is in desperate need of improvement.



Clearly, the No Child Left Behind Act for public education could be replicated with a No Corporation Left Behind Act for business and industry. This new legislation would focus on: (1) discouraging innovation by regimenting and mechanizing all daily activity, whether effective or not; (2) downplaying all creative activity as a waste of time; (3) limiting analytical thinking and invention, since they're not critical to the mission; and (4) requiring frequent standardized tests developed by the government for all employees, with success on these tests the highest priority for businesses and corporations, rather than developing high-quality products or innovative techniques.



The chief goal of this new No Corporation Left Behind law would be to subsequently embarrass and humiliate corporate and business institutions with government labeling that would be widely publicized by the news media, in phrases such as "has been warned," "in corrective action," "in need of improvement," "not making adequate progress," or "failing—should be taken over for restructuring." The underlying principle of this proposed legislation would be that everyone inside a business or corporation is either incompetent or stupid, so they all must be bludgeoned to greatness.



If these goals and purposes for the proposed No Corporation Left Behind Act seem questionable or even a bit silly, please be reminded that the concepts are very similar to what has been done to public education via the No Child Left Behind Act. After all, should not the federal government's "brilliant" recipe for school improvement also be utilized to create business improvement?





The writer was the superintendent of the Upper Darby school district in Pennsylvania from 1984 to 1999.

Joseph P. Batory


FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of education issues vital to a democracy. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information click here. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.