Orwell Award Announcement SusanOhanian.Org Home


[Susan notes: Alfie's point about reform is important. What the public gets via the media is school reform as the monolithic entity dished out by the corporate politicos. In truth, many people who know a lot about education work for various reform models, mostly ignored by the media.

]

Submitted to New York Times Magazine but not published
05/23/2010
http://www.alfiekohn.org/teaching/nytmagltr2.html

To the editor

Steven Brill's "The Teachers' Unions' Last Stand" (May 23) presents a deeply misleading account of the current struggles over education policy, one that implicitly accepts three inaccurate ΓΆ€“ and politically potent ΓΆ€“ ways of framing the discussion. First, the term "student achievement" is used to mean little more than scores on fill-in-the-bubble tests despite serious questions about the validity and value of those tests. If policy makers rarely understand the difference between meaningful learning and high standardized test scores, it's partly due to writers who chronically conflate the two.



Second, Brill has accepted the claim that a top-down, corporate-styled, test-driven approach to changing education is not only beneficial but synonymous with the very idea of "reform." One might question whether merit pay (mostly based on test results), more charter schools (which often siphon public funds to for-profit companies), and less job security for teachers deserves to be called reform at all. But it is indisputable that many other ways have been proposed to reform education -- something that a reader would never realize given that these politicians and corporate executives are presented as "the school reform movement."



Finally, we're led to believe that these brave "reformers" are struggling against a single, but diabolically powerful, impediment: teachers' unions. Given that the union leadership appears to be faithfully representing the interests of its membership, it seems reasonable to conclude that this reactionary "reform" model is actually opposed by most of the people teaching our children; it's just more expedient for politicians to frame their battle as being against the unions. In any case, all those teachers are joined in their opposition by many -- probably most -- education researchers, activists, and others whose expertise lies in helping children learn. To that extent, the question on your cover, "Are teachers' unions the enemy of reform?" has it exactly backward. The real question is, "Are those who call themselves reformers the enemy of good teaching?"

Alfie Kohn


FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of education issues vital to a democracy. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information click here. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.