Orwell Award Announcement SusanOhanian.Org Home

[Susan notes: ]

Published in Washington Post

Spend Money on Books, Not Programs

The Post's article on giving children rewards for reading ("Heavy reading reaps benefits," March 19) does not include the scientific research. The research says that students who receive rewards for reading do not read better or read more than those who do not. There is, however, plenty of evidence that reading itself encourages more reading; for example, children who participate in sustained silent reading programs read more on their own than those who do not, even years after the program ends. This research suggests that when programs such as Accelerated Reader and Reading Counts! appear to work it is because of the increased access to interesting books, not the tests and rewards. The money spent on such programs might be better spent on books.

Stephen Krashen, Ph.D.
Emeritus Professor
University of Southern California

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of education issues vital to a democracy. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information click here. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.