Orwell Award Announcement SusanOhanian.Org Home

[Susan notes: The article makes so-called Renaissance Reading 'research' look legitimate. Good for Krashen in providing some real research. Another thing that could be mentioned is that Accelerated Reader discourages nonfiction reading by giving more points to fiction, which, by and large, comes in longer books. Example:

Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone: 320 pages = 12 points

Pyramid by Macaulay: 80 pages = 1 point]

Submitted to THE Journal but not published

To the editor

Student Reading Practices Lag Far Behind National Goals (Dec. 9) claims that young people these days are reading books that don't challenge them, that is, fiction written below their grade level. The data comes from a report published by the Renaissance Learning company, and is based on what young people read when they participate in the Accelerated Reader program in school. Accelerated Reader is a commercial program owned by Renaissance Learning that gives readers points on tests based on what they read, and awards prizes in exchange for the points.

What the report really shows is that students have discovered that they can earn more points by reading easier books. Contrary to the Renaissance Learning report, previous studies have shown that reading that young people choose on their own is typically at grade level, or harder than the reading typically assigned by teachers, and gets more challenging as children mature.

This suggests that Accelerated Reader dumbs down students' reading practices.

Some sources:

Self-selected reading at grade level: Shin, F. & Krashen, S. (2007). Summer Reading: Program and Evidence. New York: Allyn & Bacon.

Self-selected reading harder than assigned reading: Southgate, V., Arnold, H., and Johnson, S. (1981). Extending Beginning Reading. London: Heinemann Educational Books.

Stephen Krashen

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of education issues vital to a democracy. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information click here. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.