Orwell Award Announcement SusanOhanian.Org Home

[Susan notes: Paul Peterson's press appearance come with heavy foundation backing. Gerald Bracey named Peterson, professor at Harvard University and senior fellow at the Hoover Institution, 'the most ardent voucher proponent in academia.' Here's Kevin Franck, People for the American Way: "Paul Peterson is a conservative political operative in the guise of a scholar.'

In a paper prepared for a symposium prepared by the Economics of Education Review, Peterson and a co-author wrote: ". . . we also find evidence that teachers may become less effective with experience . . . ."]

Submitted to Los Angeles Times but not published

To the editor

Paul Peterson (Op-ed, No Child Left Behind and testing help hold schools accountable) asserts that yearly testing done under No Child Left Behind (NCLB) resulted in increased test scores ("modest" gains in math), "solid evidence" in support of annual testing. Ron Harris ( letters, Feb. 27) argues that the increased test scores are due to better test-taking strategies.

Researchers Jaekyung Lee and Todd Reeves analyzed data (Revisiting the impact of NCLB high-stakes school accountability, capacity and resources: State NAEP 1990-2009 reading and math achievement gaps and trends. Education Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 34(2)) from all 50 states from 1990 to 2009 and concluded that the NCLB testing policy did not increase reading gains and did not close ethnic/racial and socio-economic achievement gaps in reading. Gains in math were not "modest" but small, and the reduction of the math achievement gap fell far short of reaching NCLB targets. Lee and Reeves based their conclusions on the NAEP test, a "low-stakes" test that is immune to "test preparation."

NCLB test score gains were not due to better test-prep: Lee and Reeves' analysis strongly suggests that they never happened.

Stephen Krashen

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of education issues vital to a democracy. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information click here. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.