Orwell Award Announcement SusanOhanian.Org Home


[Susan notes: Lisa, testing reform analyst, National Center for Fair and Open Testing, gets in all the facts that Freedman left out.]

Published in New York Times
08/09/2004

To the editor

Promoting children in academic trouble is a "recipe for disaster," as Samuel G. Freedman notes (On Education column, Aug. 4).



But decades of independent research show that retention - holding children back in the same grade for another year - is an even worse educational policy. The vigorous outcry over Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg's third-grade retention plan is justified by decades of independent studies.



Students who were held back in New York City, Chicago and other large school districts did no better on average than similar students who were not retained, and were up to twice as likely to drop out of school.



If educational policy were based on independent evidence, not political sloganeering, New York schools would focus efforts on helping students in grades K-3 before they fail.



Retention is long proved to leave many children behind.



Lisa Guisbond


FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of education issues vital to a democracy. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information click here. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.