Orwell Award Announcement SusanOhanian.Org Home


[Susan notes: The public hasn't a clue what a cut off score is and it's a good idea to inform them how arbitrary and politically expedient passing rates are.]

Published in Fresno Bee
03/19/2005

To the editor




The editorial on maintaining the Exit Exam (March 19, 2005) is flawed on many fronts:



1. The CAHSEE is not a valid assessment of what a student knows and is able to do. In its own testing guide the Dept. of Education ( as well as The Joint Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing ) says," A decision or characterization about a student should not be make on the basis of a single test score." National PTA & McGraw Hill and 27 other organizations call for multiple measures, not just one.



2. Parents and students are not informed by the state of the random and systematic errors in each test administration which could easily invalidate an individual score.



3. An independent study by the Educational Policy Studies Laboratory concludes by saying, "the implementation of high school graduation exams results in a decrease in academic achievement. It was found that after high-stakes graduation exams were implemented, ACT, SAT and AP scores declined."



4. States with a graduation exam requirement averaged a 64% graduation rate, 8% lower than the 72% for the states without the requirement. Lower achieving students were 25% more likely to drop out of high school than comparable peers in non-test states ( EPSL)



5. The cut off scores for graduation are not made on educational grounds ( it takes 55% on a test to pass ) but rather what is politically expedient: What should the graduation score be so that we do not have a revolt on our hands?





Rog Lucido, Educators and Parents Against Testing Abuse


FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of education issues vital to a democracy. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information click here. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.