Orwell Award Announcement SusanOhanian.Org Home


[Susan notes: What's to comment? Walt Gardner's letters are omnipresent and quite wonderful.]

Published in Amerocan Enterprise Magazine website
00/00/0000

To the editor

Naomi Riley's argument for merit pay for teachers does not stand up to scrutiny (SCAN, March). The only way to assess the validity of her claim is to design a rigorous study with experimental and control groups. The schools in each group need to be similar in terms of prior achievement, poverty level, demographics, and method of assignment.



Riley considers none of these factors in broadly concluding that merit pay results in higher educational quality than the traditional basis for paying teachers. Instead, she relies on testimonials and her own casual observation of Columbia University's school. To buttress her case, she then cites "a blue-ribbon commission" that recommended pay-for-performance for New York City public schools.



It's interesting to note the double standard in The American Enterprise: Editors are so exacting in their demands for evidence when supporters of public schools speak, but are so casual about evidence when critics opine.





Walt Gardner


FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of education issues vital to a democracy. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information click here. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.