Orwell Award Announcement SusanOhanian.Org Home

[Susan notes: Thank you to Steve for stating clearly just what being anti- or pro-phonics means.]

Published in Education Week

To the editor

In her June 22, 2005 letter to the editor, "Seeing Journalistic Bias in Reading Coverage," Marsha Kessler accuses Education Week of being “anti-phonics.” It is not clear to me what exactly she means by that.

There are (at least) three positions on phonics: One position is “intensive, systematic phonics,” an extremist view that insists that all the major rules of phonics be explicitly taught in a strict order. This is the position taken by the National Reading Panel.

A second position, zero phonics, forbids the direct teaching of any sound-spelling correspondences. This is also an extremist view. I know of no teacher or scholar who holds this position.

A third position is “basic phonics,” the direct teaching of those straightforward rules that students can learn, remember, and apply while reading to help make texts more comprehensible. Basic phonics claims that our knowledge of the complex rules of phonics is the result of reading.

Basic phonics is the position supported by most whole-language advocates, and is the position presented in the report “Becoming a Nation of Readers”: “… [P]honics instruction should aim to teach only the most important and regular of letter-to-sound relationships. … [O]nce the basic relationships have been taught, the best way to get children to refine and extend their knowledge of letter-sound correspondences is through repeated opportunities to read. If this position is correct, then much phonics instruction is overly subtle and probably unproductive.”

Stephen Krashen

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of education issues vital to a democracy. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information click here. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.