Orwell Award Announcement SusanOhanian.Org Home


[Susan notes: We can hope these letters represent the general reaction to the article in question.]

Published in New York Times
03/12/2007

To the editor



Re “Federal-Local Clash in War Over Teaching Reading”

(news article, March 9):



“One size fits all” tends to exclude a large chunk of

the population, whether you’re talking about clothes

or how to teach reading.



Those so-called experts who are convinced that phonics

is the only method that works should look at research

on the different ways people learn. Or perhaps go into

a classroom and work with real students.



The approach of tailoring reading instruction to the

student makes much more sense.



And what’s the point of hiring teachers if you’re not

going to rely on their judgment? If teachers can’t

alter their lesson plans to help each individual

student, you might as well turn education over to

robots.



Nancy Jane Moore

Washington, March 9, 2007



â€Â˘



To the Editor:



As a former elementary school educator, I find myself

horrified at Reading First, the plan that the Bush

administration is pushing to influence the teaching of

reading in this country. This is supposed to end the

age-old war over the various methods of teaching

reading and immerse every child in this country in

phonics.



It matters not to the administration that the schools

in Madison, Wis., have demonstrated great success in

teaching reading using the Balanced Literacy approach,

emphasizing whole language. In all, this

administration is simply demonstrating how very little

it knows about the art and science of teaching

reading.



Children have different learning styles, and what

seems to have the best success in the teaching of

reading is a multipronged approach.



Of course a certain amount of phonics is necessary,

but unlocking words and stories through context clues

and an immersion in language is very exciting, too.



Children need to want to have success in opening up

the world of language, and just plain phonics is not

enough.



Francine Fleishman

Boca Raton, Fla., March 9, 2007



â€Â˘



To the Editor:



As a former elementary school reading teacher and a

student of languages, I can state unequivocally that

the only languages in which it makes sense to teach

reading using the phonics-only method are those like

Spanish, in which there is a one-to-one sound-symbol

correspondence.



English, made up as it is of words from many sources,

can be taught effectively only using a balanced

approach of phonics and other strategies, like whole

language. The federal government has once again

erroneously determined that where millions of children

are concerned, one size fits all.



Ann J. Kirschner

Brooklyn, March 9, 2007

multiple authors


FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of education issues vital to a democracy. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information click here. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.