Orwell Award Announcement SusanOhanian.Org Home

NCLB Outrages

Split Over Schools . . .Parents and Teachers Disagree on Reforms

Ohanian Comment: This is a syndicated column so it gets different headlines in different papers. The Burlington Free Press carried this headline: Two divergent views of education And this subhead: Change in the classroom depends foremost on what teachers are willing and able to do.

Headlines are one thing. An even more disturbing reality is that syndicated columns also get altered in their syndication. I indicate in red parts deleted in the Burlington paper. Doesn't this make you wonder how the column was altered in your paper?

Not that the Broder column in its pure state, presenting as it does a simplistic view of school complexity and a throwaway use of the word "reform," is anything to cheer about.

Even more seriously, I wonder if reporters were given access to the full report or if they just relied on summaries. The report is not yet available on the ETS website. We need to see the actual questions used in order to judge the accuracy of the summaries.

By emphasizing that one pollster is a Republican and the other a Democrat, Broder gives credence to the ETS spin that the report is impartial. But with pollsters like Hart, they don't need any conservatives. Here's the stated goal/purpose of Hart Research, lifted right off their website.

Hart research has been at the cutting edge of change in the field of public opinion for the past quarter century. Its commercial division has demonstrated genuine creativity in designing research that provides meaningful and actionable insights, and the ability to effectively harness research into clear strategic goals.

It is interesting to see in the poll Summary the way the interpretation is strongly skewed to show NCLB in a favorable light.

And here's perhaps the most telling information: Prior to conducting the surveys, Hart Research convened four focus group discussions among parents of public school children (2), and high school administrators (2). Groups were conducted in Alexandria, Virginia, and Columbus, Ohio.

On the Winston Group website, we learn

The Winston Group is in the business of asking the right questions to get the right answers.

Indeed. Broder can pontificate all he wants (revealing how little he knows about the real issues). The purpose of this poll is not to gather information; the purpose of this poll is to change public opinion.

The good news is that the American public values education so highly that it is prepared to support almost any sensible reform that promises to improve the quality of grade schools and high schools.

The bad news is that the people teaching in those schools are deeply opposed to current reform efforts and skeptical of the basic premise that all students should be measured by the same high standards.

Those are the paradoxical lessons I draw from a briefing this week on a comprehensive survey of parents, educators and the general public sponsored by the Educational Testing Service and conducted jointly by the polling firms of Peter D. Hart, a Democrat, and David Winston, a Republican.

As for the value of education, when asked to identify from a list of five options the single greatest source of U.S. success in the world, the public education system edged out our democratic system of government for first place, with our entrepreneurial culture, military strength, and advantages of geography and natural resources far behind.

A plurality of parents gave a B grade to their own children's school and a C to the country's schools. When given a brief description of the No Child Left Behind Act, the Bush administration's school reform program, parents, by 45 percent to 34 percent, viewed it favorably. That may not seem like much of an endorsement, but it came after a year of increased controversy and criticism of the program, from some conservatives and many Democrats, and represented a slight improvement from last year.

But high school teachers were decidedly more negative, rating the legislation unfavorably by a ratio of 75 percent to 19 percent. When asked if the basic approach of that law should be extended to high school by requiring states to set standards and test students in grades nine through 12, more than four out of 10 parents said they strongly favored it, but an equal portion of high school teachers was strongly opposed.

More troubling, from the viewpoint of reformers, is the gap between teachers and the public on the question of performance standards for students. Those polled were asked to choose between the view that all students, teachers and schools should be held to the same standard of performance because it is wrong to have lower expectations for students from disadvantaged backgrounds, and the contrary view that they should not be held to the same standard because we should not expect teachers working with disadvantaged students to have them reach the same level of performance on standardized tests as teachers in more affluent schools.

More than half of the parents favored the single standard, but only one-quarter of the high school teachers agreed.

These differences help explain why the two big teachers unions and the Bush administration have been at odds over the implementation of No Child Left Behind.

The implications for the effort to improve the schools are pretty negative. Realistically, change in the classroom depends first and foremost on what teachers are willing and able to do. Change can be coerced only up to a point. If what President Bush has called the "soft bigotry of low expectations" is viewed by most teachers as a realistic appraisal of some students, that negative message will pervade the schools.

Fortunately, there are other findings in the poll that offer more encouragement. Parents agreed with teachers that problems in the broader society affect the schools and cannot be solved entirely within the classroom. While current federal standards rely primarily on achievement tests in evaluating school performance, and some educators argue that it would be better to measure year-to-year progress of students, large majorities of parents and teachers said that both measures were important and should go into the evaluations.

They also agreed that the work of improving elementary schools is far from finished and that reforming those schools should have priority over moving on to the high schools. Fewer than one in five teachers or parents would switch the priority to high schools at this point.

When it comes to high schools, there is broad agreement that real-world, work-related experiences are important and that the problem of dropouts is critical. But parents are much more likely than teachers to believe that expectations and standards are set too low and that students are not sufficiently challenged. An earlier survey by Achieve Inc., a private business group, reported that only 24 percent of recent high school graduates said they faced challenging standards.

Clearly the educators and the public are on different wavelengths when it comes to conditions in our schools. That is a real barrier to progress.


— David S. Broder
Washington Post and Burlington Free Press


This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of education issues vital to a democracy. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information click here. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.