Armstrong Williams Had Plenty of Company
The Dallas Morning News had the grace to blush and apologize: "We had no idea that [the op-ed writer] had 'government financial sponsorship'" as director of one of the groups accepting DoE funds. The Morning News also published its own story, later picked up by the Knight-Ridder-Tribune wire, about the report. "People looking at advertisements or reading their local newspapers would have had no idea that what they were reading was bought and paid for with their tax dollars," the story quotes from a statement by Rep. George Miller (D-Calif.), the ranking Democrat on the House Education and Workforce Committee who requested the review. [Disclosure: Rep. Miller, whom I have never met, has also written for the Huffington Post.]
As the USA Today story notes, some of the DOE's promotional money wasn't exactly monitored well. "[M]ore than $1.7 million went to outside PR contracts for which officials couldn't produce all of the materials, including one $1.6 million contract to ZGS Communications that [Inspector General John] Higgins still wants to review." Other disputed contracts include: $631,775 to the Cuban American National Council, "which the report says had yet to produce anything." And $2,650 to North American Precis Syndicate (NAPS), "which produced what amounted to a 284-word infomercial for the National Center of Education Statistics Web site."
The report stops well short of characterizing as "covert propaganda" the material produced by the 10 of 11 groups who did not disclose their funding from DOE, as required by law. E&P adds: "The Inspector General did conclude that it was improper for organizations to use DOE grant money to produce and disseminate public materials without including a disclaimer about funding, and said the appropriate course of action is to recover grant monies paid to these groups."
FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of education issues vital to a democracy. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information click here. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.