Orwell Award Announcement SusanOhanian.Org Home


NCLB Outrages

Testing industry overwhelmed under NCLB

By Greg Toppo

The standardized testing industry is "buckling under the weight" of President Bush's education reform plan, with the law's rapidly expanding testing mandates threatening to undermine its high ideals, says a new report out Tuesday from Education Sector, an independent Washington think tank.

Only about $20 of the average $8,000-per-pupil spent on education nationally goes to develop tests under No Child Left Behind (NCLB), the report finds. That's a small proportion, given the tests' importance, says Thomas Toch, the report's author.

Enacted in 2002, NCLB seeks to narrow the gap in basic skills between middle-class and poor students. But the modest spending on testing could pull the rug out, with many states now forced to buy or create hastily developed, low-quality tests that measure only rudimentary skills, Toch says. Such tests make it impossible for high-performing students' scores to rise above a certain level, despite learning more. So low performers' rising scores make it appear as if the nation's "achievement gap" is closing.

"You're giving a skewed sense of student achievement," Toch says.

What's worse, he says, such tests "are encouraging teachers to make the same low-level skills the priorities of their classrooms." Rather than being a solution, he says, such testing is "fast becoming part of the problem in public education."

Kurt Landgraf, president and CEO of Educational Testing Service, says Toch overstates the problem. "I think we're still working on it but we're making real progress," he says.

Susan Aspey, Department of Education spokeswoman, says reports from states are "positive and they say they're on track to have their assessments in place, so it's premature to be making any sweeping judgments."

Toch recommends that the federal government more than double its funding, from $406 million to $860, to help states develop high-quality tests.

For decades, testing companies have sold carefully developed standardized tests to school districts. NCLB's mandates that virtually every child in grades three through eight in every public school take annual math and reading tests tied to state standards have forced testing companies to generate "vastly larger pools of credible test questions" on shorter timelines, the report says. Competitive pressures, high turnover and mistakes by testmakers all take their toll, with more requirements on the way.

The study estimates that public schools, which now give about 33.6 million tests under NCLB, must add another 11.4 million by the end of the current school year, straining testmakers.

Eric Bassett, research director of Eduventures, a Boston-based firm that studies the education industry, says such problems are to be expected with NCLB. "It's an issue of transition. The consensus seems to be that the NCLB-like requirements around accountability ... are here to stay, so these things will be worked out."

Testing problems
According to a fall 2005 survey of 23 state testing offices (representing 53% of the nation's school children) by Education Sector:

52% reported that they had had difficulty recruiting and retaining qualified staff for testing-related jobs.

35% reported a "significant error" by a testing contractor in scoring a state test since 2000.

20% reported problems receiving test results from test contractors "in a timely fashion" since 2000.

Source: Education Sector

— Greg Toppo
USA Today
2006-02-01


INDEX OF NCLB OUTRAGES


FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of education issues vital to a democracy. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information click here. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.