Orwell Award Announcement SusanOhanian.Org Home


NCLB Outrages

Kids Obese? Then Eliminate P. E.

Ohanian Comment: Some say it's unfair to blame the disappearance of P. E. on NCLB, but as the test mania increases, kids no longer have room for "extras" (nontested subjects) in their test prep schedules.


WASHINGTON - Missing from the schedules of many students this year is one class that used to be a given: physical education. From North Carolina to Hawaii, gym classes have been squeezed out of the school day -- a trend that parallels a national increase in childhood obesity.

In 1991, four in 10 high school students took daily PE classes; 10 years later, the proportion was reduced to barely a third.

In 1980, just 5 percent of school-age children were severely overweight; 20 years later, the number had jumped to 15 percent.

Few would argue that the one trend is completely responsible for the other, but a lack of physical activity -- in school or out --is a significant contributor to obesity.

But for an increasing number of schools faced with shrinking budgets and growing demands for improved academic performance on standardized tests -- mandated by the federal No Child Left Behind Act -- physical education is a luxury they can no longer afford.

"It's a terrible, terrible decision," said Anne Bryant, executive director of the National School Boards Association.

"Do you cut math and reading, or do you cut PE? -- There's a lot more to this thing we call learning than simply test scores."

Other factors contribute to the obesity epidemic, including school lunches loaded with fat and vending machine junk food on and off campus. But officials increasingly point to the loss of physical education classes as a culprit.

Among the agencies that have begun to focus on the problem is the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Howell Wechsler, a health scientist in the CDC's Division of Adolescent and School Health, says society should take advantage of the time children are in school to teach them "the skills and attitudes needed to embrace a physically active lifestyle."

The need for in-school exercise was underscored in the results of a recent national survey by the CDC that found that almost two-thirds -- 61.5 percent -- of 9- to 13-year-olds participate in no organized physical activities outside of school.

More than a fifth -- 22.6 percent -- engage in no physical activity in their free time.

"Schools are not going to be able, on their own, to reverse this obesity epidemic," Wechsler acknowledged.

"But they're an important part of the puzzle."

The CDC, the American Heart Association and the National Association for Sports and Physical Education are among the many organizations that recommend daily PE from kindergarten through 12th grade.

Physical activity offers clear short- and long-term health benefits; in addition, most health scientists believe that children who exercise regularly perform better academically.

Illinois is the only state to mandate daily PE from kindergarten through 12th grade. And even there, physical education classes are not a sure thing.

A recent survey estimated that fewer than 10 percent of the state's elementary schools comply with the law.

Some states require daily PE in elementary school, but requirements in virtually all states decline as children age. Until recently, students in most states had to take a year or two of PE in high school to graduate.

Minnesota recently eliminated physical education as a graduation requirement, and a new Florida law allows high school students to graduate in three years by skipping PE and some electives.

And roughly one-third of all high schools give students another out: If they participate in band, cheerleading, school sports teams or similar activities, they are exempt from physical education requirements.

In Hawaii, where 1 in every 4 children is obese and there are no minimum PE requirements for elementary and middle schools, the state Board of Education is considering reducing the graduation requirement from one year of high school PE to one semester.

"The curriculum is light on PE," said department spokesman Greg Knudsen, "but we do have year-round accessibility to outdoor sports."

Even California's relatively tough requirements - elementary schools must offer an average of 20 minutes of PE per day; middle and high schools must offer an average of 40 minutes per day; and high school students must take PE for two years to graduate -- have produced disappointing results.

Only 24 percent of the state's fifth-, seventh- and ninth-graders met minimal physical fitness standards last year.

Dianne Wilson-Graham, who directs physical education in California, noted that the state does not enforce its requirements. "There are a lot of demands on teachers," she said.

In North Carolina, James Causby, superintendent of Johnston County schools, sees overweight students and knows that additional PE classes would promote fitness, new skills and, very likely, better learning.

"We do not provide as much physical education as we would like to," Causby said.

"We don't give it to elementary school students every day, and some middle school students don't get it at all." To graduate, high school students need one year of PE.

Yet when the state Legislature considered a bill this year that would have mandated a minimum weekly PE requirement, Causby - along with the state school boards association and the North Carolina Association of Educators - opposed it.

Daily PE in elementary schools would require the hiring of more specially trained teachers, leaving the schools with fewer classroom teachers and larger classes, Causby said. "And that would be negative on student (academic) achievement."

Offering daily PE in a middle school in his district, he said, would require adding five PE teachers at a cost of roughly $200,000 a year - or cutting electives such as band, drama and choir.

Other options include lengthening the school day or taking time away from academics, but "no one wants to do" either of those, Causby said.

Ultimately, Causby found himself asking: Is promoting physical activity the school system's responsibility? He decided that childhood obesity is a societal -- not educational -- issue.

It is an argument many strapped school systems are falling back on as they cut physical education classes.

Despite a rash of cuts in physical education programs, some states and schools are bucking the trend.

Federal officials and PE experts cite an innovative skills-based program in Michigan and South Carolina's recent decision to grade schools on PE as well as academics.

The Texas school board, which phased out elementary school PE in 1995 to allow more time for academics, voted last year to restore the requirement.

A number of schools have added heart monitors, climbing walls and hiking trails to their PE programs.

Some schools have worked to integrate physical education with academic subjects.

If PE students are learning about their target heart rate, for example, classroom teachers can use math to teach them how to calculate it, science to explain how the heart functions and health education to convey the role diet plays in heart health.

The CDC has sponsored an advertising campaign encouraging adolescents to be active, and the Department of Health and Human Services will soon award about $15 million in grants to schools and community organizations for programs promoting physical activity.

Among proponents of physical education is Sen. Ted Stevens, R-Alaska, a lifetime physical fitness buff who three years ago sponsored legislation creating the Carol M. White Physical Education for Progress program.

Administered by the Department of Education, the program has or will soon award $115 million in grants to help schools buy PE equipment, hire and train instructors and renovate gyms and other facilities.

— Vicki Kemper
Schools phase out physical education requirements
Los AngelesTimes
2003-09-28
http://www.bayarea.com/mld/cctimes/living/education/6881380.htm


INDEX OF NCLB OUTRAGES


FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of education issues vital to a democracy. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information click here. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.