Orwell Award Announcement SusanOhanian.Org Home


NCLB Outrages

Slow readers have difficulty trying to catch up, study says

Ohanian Comment: I'm struck by the fact that it cost $9 million to study 772 children. That's $11,658 per child. Per child. Think of what benefits would accrue to each child's family--and to the child's reading ability--with that chunk of money. It would make an interesting study, wouldn't it? For another interesting study, look at what Canadians discovered about the power of librarians and library books. Think of how many library books $9 million would buy.

Here's an Executive Summary of the study.


By Eleanor Chute

Helping older elementary school children who are struggling to read is even harder than some of the experts think.

A study involving 50 schools in the Allegheny County suburbs -- the largest of its kind in the nation -- showed that the intensive help provided for such students improved skills for third-graders but was less effective for fifth-graders.

And even where there was improvement in both grade levels, the help wasn't enough to catch up with the strong readers, who were continuing to advance.

"I don't think there's going to be any secret formula and no one thing that works for every child," said Joseph K. Torgesen, principal investigator of the Florida Center for Reading Research at Florida State University.

While they didn't catch up, the third-graders, in particular were "better off in terms of the lower-level word skills for having participated," said David Myers, senior vice president of Mathematica Policy Research.

The $9.6 million study was part of the Power4Kids Reading Initiative started by the Haan Foundation for Children of San Francisco and done in cooperation with the Allegheny Intermediate Unit.

The results were released this week. A total of 772 children with reading difficulties participated in the study during the 2003-04 school year.

More than 300 of the students were randomly assigned to a control group and received the regular reading instruction provided in their schools, which in some cases was quite a bit of extra instruction, Dr. Torgesen said.

The others received an average of 80 hours of help in small groups -- one teacher to three students -- using one of four reading programs: Spell Read Phonological Auditory Training (PAT), Corrective Reading, Wilson Reading or Failure Free Reading.

Dr. Torgesen said the programs concentrated on fundamental reading skills.

In some cases, the control group fell farther behind while the group receiving the extra help did not.

Dr. Torgesen said the older readers, in particular, may have benefitted more if they had had more instruction on comprehension skills.

From the results, Dr. Torgesen has this advice for parents: "If their child is at the low end, is a really struggling reader, somebody who is still in the third grade, still reads like a first-grader, they really should receive an intervention very much like what we provide to these children."

But for children who are a year or a year-and-a-half behind, he said, "They would be seeking out interventions that really focus powerfully on teaching kids directly how to comprehend what they read."

When she heard that third-graders fared better than fifth-graders, Robin Pleta, a resource support teacher at Eisenhower Elementary School in Upper St. Clair who participated in the study, likened it to learning a golf swing.

"If you can catch it and correct it early, it's a little bit easier to correct it. By the time you get to fifth grade, you've had five years of practicing skills that haven't served you well," she said.

Dr. Torgesen said he was both surprised and disappointed to discover that the interventions didn't work as well for low-income children.

"This amount of instruction doesn't appear to be enough or the right thing for many of the kids who need it the most," he said.

echute@post-gazette.com

— Eleanor Chute
Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
2006-04-07


INDEX OF NCLB OUTRAGES


FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of education issues vital to a democracy. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information click here. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.