Orwell Award Announcement SusanOhanian.Org Home


NCLB Outrages

States, Companies Struggle to Handle Testing Mandates

Okay, let's admit it: we revel in their misery.

Harcourt Assessment, which declined an interview with NPR, said in a statement, its tardiness was caused by challenges with processing orders and delays in developing the test.


from News and Notes with Ed Gordon

CHERYL CORLEY reporting: ...to grab their #2 yellow pencils and take their state-mandated reading test. Unidentified Man: Now, let's officially start.

CORLEY: And it's not a moment too soon for Gary Huwer. The school's principal still had boxes of the ISAT exams, or the Illinois Standards Achievement Test, stacked in his office bathroom. He said the school had to get a waiver to push back its test date by a week.

Mr. GARY HUWER (Principal, Millstadt Community Consolidated School District #160): Even then, we didn't have all the necessary materials. We were missing reader scripts, which our special ed teachers use for their students. We were also missing the paper rulers, well they never came either.

CORLEY: Under the federal No Child Left Behind provision, this is the first year states must test every child from third through eighth grade and one high school level grade in reading and math. That means millions of tests that must be accounted for, and Principal Huwer says that may be part of the reason for the state's problems with its new testing firm.

Mr. HUWER: I'm not sure they were ready for the volume or the magnitude of the test statewide and I think anytime you rush to get things going, you make mistakes.

CORLEY: Millstadt wasn't the only school district complaining. Meta Minton, with the State Board of Education, says the agency granted testing extensions to at least 130 Illinois districts, nearly one out of every five. And angry state officials threaten to drop Harcourt's contract.

Ms. META MINTON (Illinois State Board of Education): The silver lining here is that Harcourt is going to pay for the overtime, transportation, assorted costs that these districts have had to incur, caused by, you know, the fiasco with ISAT.

CORLEY: Harcourt Assessment, which declined an interview with NPR, said in a statement, its tardiness was caused by challenges with processing orders and delays in developing the test. There have been problems elsewhere, most recently in Alabama, where Harcourt made scoring errors on about 2,500 tests; and in Connecticut, where Harcourt was fined after providing incorrect reading scores for about 350 students. But Harcourt is not the only testing firm with problems.

Mr. JACK JENNINGS (President, Center on Education Policy): No, no it is not.

CORLEY: Jack Jennings is president of the DC-based Center on Education Policy. He's also a board member of another testing firm, Educational Testing Service. Jennings says just about every one of the half dozen companies that dominate the testing industry has made mistakes, most notably with the SAT.

Mr. JENNINGS: In fact, the College Board for the last month has had a series of problems with test results.

CORLEY: The test companies say the mistakes they make are small when compared to the millions of tests they give every year. Jennings says the crux of the problem is that there are too few testing companies, and a shortage of trained experts for them to hire.

Mr. JENNINGS: And so there aren't enough people being produced who can produce the tests. There isn't enough of an expansion in the testing companies to be able to process the tests adequately, in efficiency. And yet, the demands for more and more testing keep growing.

CORLEY: And there will be more of a challenge next year when the No Child Left Behind law will require states to come up with science tests in addition to reading and math.

Cheryl Corley, NPR NEWS, Chicago.

— Cheryl Corley
National Public Radio, Chicago
2006-04-25


INDEX OF NCLB OUTRAGES


FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of education issues vital to a democracy. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information click here. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.