Lawmakers say 'No Child' law not going anywhere: We'd Better Do Something Ourselves!
Ohanian Comment: When will educators give up on hoping corporate-politicos will do the right thing for children and end or even modify NCLB in any substantive way?
Educators need to do something that doesn't come easy. We don't need to make kids spell words while climbing walls,which sounds more like torture than education. We need to follow Walt Whitman's advice and Resist much.
TO The States, or any one of them, or any city of The States, Resist much, obey little;
Once unquestioning obedience, once fully enslaved;
Once fully enslaved, no nation, state, city, of this earth, ever afterward resumes its liberty.
--Leaves of Grass
Subscribe to Substance
Buy a CD: 15 songs of NCLB resistance.
Buy multiple copies of our antiDIBELS book and give them to your school board and the local media.
Hey, join VSSE and help us spread Resistance. VSSE has taken the lead in making critical information about DIBELS available. With your help, we can do much more.
Opt Out. What if on the day of the big state test, nobody was there to give it--or take it?
Get RESISTANCE on the agenda at your union.
Reach out to parents, particularly parents of children who are harmed. They need our help and they are our allies. We need to pay more attention to parents and less to the corporate-politicos who created this mess.
Which side are you on boys?
There are no neutrals here.
WASHINGTON (AP) -- Lawmakers said Thursday they were willing to make the No Child Left Behind law more flexible, but warned there won't be a lot of extra federal money to help pay for it.
And don't expect the law to go away, members of the House Education & the Workforce Committee said as they kicked off a series of hearings in preparation for renewing the sweeping education law next year.
Since it was passed in 2001, teachers, parents and state education officials have complained about various aspects of the law, which requires schools to meet goals for student performance or face a variety of penalties.
Representative Howard "Buck" McKeon, a California Republican who chairs the House committee said he's willing to listen to the complaints, but he's more interested in how to solve any problems.
"I'd like to hear the proposed solutions," McKeon said in an interview.
Under the law, all children must be proficient in reading and math by 2014. Some educators have complained that the law's emphasis on math and reading has detracted from other subjects.
Thursday's hearing featured examples of how schools can offer broad curriculums in science, physical education and the arts, while still meeting the law's requirements on reading and math.
Garrett Lydie, a physical education teacher from Laurel, Delaware, explained how he integrated math and reading into his classes, having elementary school students spell words and solve math problems while climbing a wall.
"During many of our physical activities, students apply the concepts they are learning in areas such as math, science, writing, reading and social studies to achieve a goal," said Lydie, the 2006 teacher of the year in Delaware.
Funding is primary topic
But the issue of money kept creeping into the discussion.
"Without adequate and stable funding ... I can't get the needs met," Mickey Garrison, an elementary school principal from Roseburg, Oregon, told the committee.
Democrats have long complained that the law has not been fully funded, while Republicans argue that federal spending on education has increased significantly since the law was passed.
"I think that when you talk to people, no matter what we give them, it's not enough," McKeon said. "We have backed this up with resources and we will push for more resources. But it's not all about resources."
Representative George Miller of California, the education committee's top Democrat, said funding will be a critical issue as Congress works to renew the law.
"Where is education on the priority list of this government?" Miller asked.
The House narrowly passed a 2007 budget early Thursday that calls for cutting federal spending on education by more than $5 billion, about 7 percent.
McKeon said he has no specific plans for changing the law's requirements. "I don't have any ax to grind, other than to improve the law," he said.
Both McKeon and Miller said the committee plans to review the entire law before reauthorizing it, hearing from critics and supporters alike.
However, Miller said, it would be a waste of time for critics to argue that the law should be scrapped.
"I don't think the basic principles of the act are going to go away," Miller said.
Representative Michael Castle, R-Delaware, agreed, saying, "One thing is for sure: It's here to stay."
INDEX OF NCLB OUTRAGES