Orwell Award Announcement SusanOhanian.Org Home


NCLB Outrages

Va. Is Urged to Obey 'No Child' on Reading Test


Comments from Annie: Pompous mini-“deciders” in debates on NCLB like to say that the act does not encroach on the States’ rights or control of school policies. Here is an example of the useless nature of such rhetoric.

This particularly ignorant aspect of the act is undeniably and inherently ridiculous, but without Virginia’s compliance with the Federal mandate, from A to Z, the schools are being threatened with federal intrusion.

And in NCLB translation, that, boys and girls, means withdrawal of money!

The local School Board and their Superintendent have stepped up to the bat. Both firmly support the educators who say children who have not mastered English should not have to take a standardized high-stakes English exam. Instead, the educators want to use an exam that is more appropriate for non-fluent students who are learning English. The teachers want to continue to give these students accommodations, like time, and dictionaries.

Gasp.

The teachers agree to continue to measure the students’ learning progress. But, the Federal Department of Education, that certain (rhetorically speaking) “unmeddlesome” entity we hear so much about in their press releases, says: (in effect) give those kids the SOL.

It is evident that “SOL” has two operative meanings right now.

At this moment in time, we have a Federal Deputy Secretary who is “greatly distressed,” a State Superintendent who is “profoundly disappointed,“ and a school system that refuses to “make sense out of something that doesn't appear to be reasonable.”

Whose psychological side are you on?

So, here it is, a toast to: metaphor, hyperbole and analogy, in any language… and to students, and their teachers, and to learning.

It is time resist the deranged policies offered by an empty slogan. I have a better one.

NCLB, you are SOL.




Va. Is Urged to Obey 'No Child' on Reading Test

Maria Glod

The U.S. Department of Education threatened yesterday to take "enforcement action" against Virginia if any school districts defy a federal mandate to give reading tests to thousands of immigrant students.

In a sharply worded letter, Deputy Secretary of Education Raymond Simon said he is "greatly distressed" that some school districts, including Fairfax County, might violate the No Child Left Behind Act. Simon urged Virginia to enforce the law. If it does not, he said, federal education officials could step in, possibly withholding funds.

The dispute began last year when federal education officials rejected the reading exams that Virginia has given to many students learning English, because the tests don't cover the same grade-level material as those given to students fluent in English. Virginia educators fighting the mandate say that students who haven't mastered the language are likely to fail a traditional test and that it is unfair to administer it.

Last week, the Fairfax School Board voted to refuse to give the reading test, which is administered in the spring, to many immigrant children. The Harrisonburg School Board passed a similar measure, and Arlington County school officials are considering such a step.

Yesterday, federal education officials denied Virginia's request to use the old test for another year. They have said that Virginia educators had been aware of federal requirements for years and had ample time to design a new test. State officials disputed that, saying that they learned last spring that the assessment Virginia had used might be rejected.

Despite yesterday's warning from Simon, Fairfax Superintendent Jack D. Dale said he stands by the School Board's decision.
Fairfax will continue to test how well students with limited proficiency are learning to read, speak and write English, he said, but will only give Virginia's Standards of Learning reading tests to students who have made significant progress.

"Fairfax is doing the right thing for kids," Dale said. "We're holding all kids accountable to learn English and do it as quickly as possible." He said that Fairfax would put the Standards of Learning test "in front of the kids when they've learned enough English to have it in front of them."

Simon said in an interview that students learning English must be tested on grade-level material to determine whether they are making progress. He asked Virginia state Superintendent Billy K. Cannaday Jr. to ensure that local school districts comply.

"No Child Left Behind says all children will be able to read and do math at grade level," Simon said. "The whole point of No Child Left Behind is to find out what they know and don't know and target resources. . . . We want the law to be followed."

Cannaday said last night that he is "profoundly disappointed" in the federal response and that he joins educators statewide who are frustrated by the prospect of giving children who don't grasp the nuances of a language tests that may cover concepts such as metaphor, hyperbole or analogy.

"Our superintendents have sworn to uphold the law, but they also have a moral and ethical contract with the community, and I think they are trying to balance the two," Cannaday said. "I think our superintendents are expressing frustration about how do they make sense out of something that doesn't appear to be reasonable."

About 10,200 Virginia students, including 4,000 in Fairfax, are affected by the change, state education officials said. Students who have been in the United States less than a year are exempt from taking the reading tests.

Others learning English are allowed accommodations, such as bilingual dictionaries or more time. Once students learn enough English, they take the same tests as their peers.


— Maria Glod
Washington Post
2007-02-01
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/31/AR2007013102120_pf.html


INDEX OF NCLB OUTRAGES


FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of education issues vital to a democracy. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information click here. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.