A Bad Report Card
Ohanian Comment: AGHHHHH! Do you think that anybody in the editorial offices at The New York Times, least of all Brent Staples, has ever read the NAEP questions?
How many times does Gerald Bracey have to explain the bogus "proficiency" of the NAEP before journalists get it?
Take a look at the NAEP board and see if you want to give them even more power over our schools.
And here's a look at how they do proficiency
This section of the website has been littered with stray ??? but it's still readable. Sort of.
You can also read these pieces in Substance.
A Scoring Guide for NAEP
How NAEP Labels a Reader Proficient
I would remind you: only Substance will print this sort of expose.
For $16, you can have a subscription.
5132 W. Berteau Avenue
Chicago, IL 60641-1440
Isn't it time you subscribed?
The news from American high schools is not good. The most recent test results from the National Assessment of Educational Progress, commonly known as the national report card, finds that American 12th graders are actually performing worse in reading than 12th graders did in 1992, when a comparable exam was given. In addition, 12th-grade performance in reading has been distressingly flat since 2002, even though the states were supposed to be improving the quality of teaching to comply with the No Child Left Behind education act.
The new scores, based on tests given in 2005, show that only about 35 percent of 12th graders are proficient in reading. Simply put, this means that a majority of the countryĂ˘€™s 12th graders have trouble understanding what they read fully enough to make inferences, draw conclusions and see connections between what they read and their own experiences. The math scores were even worse, with only 23 percent of 12th graders performing at or above the proficient level.
Marginal literacy and minimal math skills might have been adequate for the industrial age. But these scores mean that many of todayĂ˘€™s high school seniors will be locked out of the information economy, where a college degree is the basic price of admission and the ability to read, write and reason is essential for success.
Congress, which is preparing to reauthorize both the No Child Left Behind Act and the Higher Education Act, needs to take a hard look at these scores and move forcefully to demand far-reaching structural changes.
It should start by getting the board that oversees the National Assessment of Educational Progress testing to create rigorous national standards for crucial subjects. It should also require the states to raise the bar for teacher qualifications and end the odious practice of supplying the neediest students with the least qualified teachers. This process would also include requiring teachers colleges, which get federal aid, to turn out higher quality graduates and to supply many more teachers in vital areas like math and science. If thereĂ˘€™s any doubt about why these reforms are needed, all Congress has to do is read the latest national report card.
New York Times
INDEX OF NCLB OUTRAGES