Orwell Award Announcement SusanOhanian.Org Home

NCLB Outrages


Ohanian Comment: New York State United Teachers (NYSUT), of which I was a member for many years, calls itself a union of professionals, and yet very few of its members have stood up and signed The Petition to end NCLB. They don't seem to realize that NCLB is systematically destroying the very profession of teaching, turning teachers into script readers. Unless and until the unions face this reality, teachers will continue to be ground into dust.

NYSUT leaders, following the corporate-politico lead, are encouraging the tweaking of NCLB. You know what their real agenda is when they call for more funding for "testing and accountability mandates." It's the testing and accountability mandates that are killing children. Why would we want more money to do more?


It is long past time for them to throw off their quisling robes; they must stand up and demand that NCLB be eliminated.

NYSUT: A Union of Professionals



WASHINGTON, D.C. April 25, 2007 テ「 Nearly 3,000 delegates to New York State United Teachersテ「
annual convention, meeting this week in Washington, D.C., will call on Congress to fix the No Child Left Behind Act, which teachers say has changed classroom instruction and narrowed the curriculum because of its overemphasis on standardized tests.

Delegates are expected to offer their NCLB initiative based on feedback from surveys, in which New York teachers consistently voiced their frustration with the five-year-old federal law, including how it jeopardizes creativity and curriculum not specifically on the test.

テ「彜tandardized tests alone cannot give an accurate or complete picture of a childテ「冱 or a schoolテ「冱 performance,テ「 said New York State United Teachers President Richard C. Iannuzzi. テ「弃arents tell us anecdotally what teachers say in the surveys: the pendulum has swung too far in the wrong direction.テ「

テ「弩e are no longer educating テ「the whole child,テ「凖「 said NYSUT Vice President Maria Neira, who oversees the unionテ「冱 Division of Research and Educational Services. テ「弩e are educating the テ「惑ill-in-the-bubble child.テ「凖「

At the 575,000 member union's policymaking convention, which begins Thursday, delegates are expected to act on a resolution seeking changes in NCLB and its テ「彗verage yearly progressテ「 requirement. AYP sets artificial targets for school improvement and carries sanctions if a school, or any one of more than 50 subgroups of students, fails to make sufficient progress. Falling short of an AYP target in one subgroup can falsely label an entire school as テ「彷ailing.テ「 NYSUT will push for meaningful changes as Congress debates reauthorization of NCLB this year. In addition to urging the full funding that was promised when NCLB became law, New York teachers support changes that would make the NCLB テ「徇ore sensible and fair,テ「 Neira said.

Teachers are asking Congress to:

テつァ Allow states to develop appropriate tests for measuring the language arts skills of English language learners and special education students, and develop a way to fairly count their progress. Currently, ELL students must take the same ELA tests as their grade level
peers, even though they may be new immigrants and donテ「冲 yet have full command of the English language.

テつァ Give credit for student progress and reward success. Permitting schools to use a growth model, which takes into account a childテ「冱 progress toward higher standards, provides better information on individual student learning.

テつァ Distinguish struggling schools from those that are successful but need limited assistance.

テつァ Acknowledge different rates of student learningテ債セ and

テつァ Stop punishing entire schools and districts based on the test scores of a small number of students.

テ「弋eachers want an accountability system that is fair and accurate テ「 one in which all students are counted and valued,テ「 Neira said. テ「廣t the same time, schools that are struggling should get help when they need it and successful schools テ「 and those that are improving テ「 should not be unfairly penalized.テ「

The NYSUT resolution calls on the federal government to adequately fund the testing and accountability mandates in the law. New York received $911 million less in funding in 2006 than what Congress authorized when it enacted NCLB in 2002. The Bush administration is proposing a cut in federal education aid for New
York in its 200708 budget.

Teacher leaders say NYSUTテ「冱 surveys of members parallel results released by The Teachersテ「 Network, a nonprofit education group that supports innovative teachers in public schools. The Network, which conducted a nationwide survey on teachersテ「 views of NCLB, provided NYSUT with New York State results, with 95 percent of teachers saying NCLBテ「冱 overemphasis on test scores is narrowing the curriculum.

Data from the Teachers' Networkテ「冱 survey of 661 New York teachers reveals:

テつァ 95 percent say the NCLB Act, with its Adequate Yearly Progress goals, encourages teachers to テ「徼each to the test.テ「 Eighty-two percent of teachers report they spend much of their time teaching students what they know will be on state tests.

テつァ 79 percent say the emphasis on testing encourages them to eliminate curriculum material that is not tested. Eighty percent say they spend a lot of time teaching test-taking skills.

テつァ 69 percent believe standardized testing is テ「從ecessary,テ「 a nod to the importance of measuring student progress and ensuring the equal opportunities for students promised by NCLB. However, just 34 percent believe the law, as currently constructed, is テ「彙eneficialテ「 to students and schools.

テつァ Just 7 percent believe NCLBテ「冱 Adequate Yearly Progress requirements for schools are helpful in closing the achievement gap.

テつァ Nearly 90 percent of New York teachers reported feeling pressured テ「 mostly from principals, administrators, school boards and the news media to raise student test scores. Survey respondents were evenly distributed across grade levels from kindergarten through grade 12.

Slightly more than half (52 percent) were not from schools that had been identified in need of improvement in any academic area or with any disaggregated student population.

Meanwhile, an online survey of 695 English Language Arts teachers by NYSUTテ「冱 Research and
Educational Services Division, found students, too, feel pressure to succeed and many are テ「徭tressed outテ「 by the testing experience:

テつァ A teacher in rural Allegany County reported that as the mandated tests approach, her fourth and fifth grade students get very nervous. テ「廴any know that they are doing poorly and it makes them feel bad about themselves,テ「 the teacher said.

テつァ テ「廬t is educationally unsound to expect students to learn optimally in a high-stress
environment,テ「 said a teacher in Westchester County.

テつァ テ「弋he greatest impact was on my ELL student,テ「 said a Rockland teacher, referring to an English language learner. テ「彜he was overwhelmed and felt a great sense of failure.テ「

テつァ テ「廾ne of my students did not want to come to school because he knew that he had to read on his own and just couldnテ「冲,テ「 said another Westchester teacher, describing a special-needs
student subjected to new testing requirements. テ「廩e just shut down and cried.テ「

テつァ テ「彜tudents seem to be better test-takers, yet they are less academically prepared,テ「 said a Saratoga County teacher. テ「廴any creative activities have been replaced by test preparation.テ「

More information about NCLB, the surveys and teachers' attitudes toward the federal law are available at www.nysut.org and www.teachersnetwork.org.

NYSUT represents 575,000 teachers, school-related professionals, academic and professional faculty in higher education, professionals in education and health care and retirees. NYSUT is affiliated with the American Federation of Teachersテ債セ National Education Association and the AFL/CIO.

— Press Release


This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of education issues vital to a democracy. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information click here. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.