Orwell Award Announcement SusanOhanian.Org Home


NCLB Outrages

The Education Reform Train is Coming (and Bill Gates and Eli Broad are the Conductors)

Here is Dan Brown's bio at Huffington Post: Dan Brown is a writer and teacher in New York City. He is the author of The Great Expectations School: A Rookie Year in the New Blackboard Jungle, a memoir of his turbulent and illuminating first year of teaching at P.S. 85 in the Bronx. The book will be released in August 2007 by Arcade Publishing and Hachette Book Group.

At twenty-two, Dan Brown graduated from NYU Film School and joined the New York City Teaching Fellows, a program designed to fill teacher shortages in the city's most high-needs schools. He has also taught in a New York City private school, the socioeconomic polar opposite of P.S. 85, and is working on his second book.


Dan Brown

Dan Brown Wed Apr 25, 10:46 PM ET

In previous posts, I examined the leading Republican and Democrat presidential candidates' websites to gauge their sentiments on education reform. There is no doubt that in 2001, when George W. Bush took office, public education was falling [sic] innumerable students, teachers, and communities. America desperately needed executive leadership to update the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) of 1965. Bush led the charge with the bilaterally supported ESEA update, widely known as the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB). The rhetoric of the legislation is laudable, trumpeting strong standards and high goals for universal proficiency. Sadly, the reality has fallen miserably short of the hype, and for good reasons. NCLB judges students solely through their standardized test scores and the pressure for teachers and administrators to come up with these high-stakes testing numbers poisons the culture of a school and does not teach kids the enduring, empowering skills that they need to go to college, get jobs, or do whatever they want. Massive under-funding has also strangled many school districts. NCLB, in its implementation, is a disaster. The next President has to do something about this.

Bill Gates and Eli Broad agree. They are bankrolling a $60 million project called Strong American Schools, set to launch immediately, just as the primary presidential debate season commences. A press release claims this initiative to be the "Nation's Largest Multi-Million Dollar Single-Issue Presidential Advocacy Campaign." To put this kind of endeavor in perspective, its budget nearly triples that of the 2004 anti-John Kerry campaign by the ubiquitous Swift Vets and P.O.W.s for Truth. In short, this campaign will be too large for any would-be President to ignore. Strong American Schools is going to force presidential candidates to take action on education, which is terrific and important. The eleven-page policy primer available on the Strong American Schools website basically reads like a dream come true for proponents of progressive education reform---except for one glaring, unclarified absence. There is no mention of reforming the practice of judging children solely through high-stakes standardized testing. This makes all of the difference. Children can have teachers who are earning merit and hazard pay and have master's degrees galore, a zillion books in their classroom libraries, more computers than Microsoft's headquarters, and nine hours in the school day. But their engagement with learning will not improve if the system continues to measure learning only by how a child does on a standardized test! I look forward to the debate that Strong American Schools will catalyze. At the heart of the discussion must be how we will measure proficiency and success. In a future post, I will describe how teachers and schools can assess children's academic progress---alongside, not in place of testing--- and do it in meaningful, supportive, and accurate ways.

— Dan Brown
Huffington Post
2007-04-25
http://news.yahoo.com/s/huffpost/20070426/cm_huffpost/046864


INDEX OF NCLB OUTRAGES


FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of education issues vital to a democracy. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information click here. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.