Orwell Award Announcement SusanOhanian.Org Home


NCLB Outrages

Focus on 2 R’s Cuts Time for the Rest, Report Says

People shouldn't mix apples and oranges. Affluent schools aren't affect by NCLB and can go their merry ways with art, music, recess, and all the rest. It is poor kids who are not allowed to take their noses out of the skill drill.

Also not included are such "subtleties" as the DIBELS influence that Linda Perlstein mentions in her book, Tested: One American School Struggles to Make the Grade:


Ms. McDermott stared throwing nonsense words into her lessons, "as much as I have to teach to the test," explaining to her children that the examiner would try to trick them. It was time she would have preferred to spend on real words, which her children needed urgently to learn.




By Sam Dillon

Almost half the nationâs school districts have significantly decreased the daily class time spent on subjects like science, art and history as a result of the federal No Child Left Behind lawâs focus on annual tests in reading and math, according to a new report released yesterday.

The report, by the Center on Education Policy, a Washington group that studies the lawâs implementation in school districts nationwide, said that about 44 percent of districts have cut time from one or more subjects or activities in elementary schools to extend time for longer daily math and reading lessons. Among the subjects or activities getting less attention since the law took effect in 2002 are science, social studies, art and music, gym, lunch and recess, the report said.

The report, based on a survey of nearly 350 of the nationâs 15,000 districts, said 62 percent of school districts had increased daily class time in reading and math since the law took effect.

Within a year of the lawâs implementation, teachers and their associations were reporting that schools and districts were suggesting or requiring that they spend more time on reading and math to improve test scores, and that they cut back time spent on other disciplines.

The narrowing of the nationâs elementary school curriculum has been significant, according to the report, but may not be affecting as many schools as previously thought.

A report that the center issued in March 2006, based on a similar survey, gave one of the first measures of the extent of the narrowing trend. It said 71 percent of districts had reduced elementary school instruction in at least one other subject to make more time for reading and mathematics. That finding attracted considerable attention, with many groups opposed to the law decrying the trend.

The lawâs backers, including Secretary of Education Margaret Spellings, argued that the intensification of English and math instruction made good sense on its own because, they said, students who could not read or calculate with fluency would flounder in other subjects, too.

The centerâs new report raises the question of how to explain the considerable discrepancy between last yearâs finding, that 71 percent of districts had reduced instructional time in subjects other than math and reading, and this yearâs, which gives the number as 44 percent.

Jack Jennings, the centerâs president, said in an interview that the discrepancy was a result of a change in the wording of the questionnaire. Last yearâs survey asked districts to say whether they had reduced instructional time in subjects other than reading and math âto a great extent,â âsomewhat,â âminimallyâ or ânot at all.â Districts that reported even minimally reduced instructional time on other subjects were included in the 71 percent, along with districts that carried out more substantial changes, Mr. Jennings said.

This year, the center listed English/language arts and math as well as social studies, art and music, science and other subjects on the survey, and asked districts whether class time in each had increased, stayed the same or decreased since the lawâs enactment. In a second column, the survey asked districts to indicate the number of minutes by which instructional time had increased or decreased.

Districts that made only small reductions this year, 10 minutes a day or less, in the time devoted to courses other than reading or math, may have chosen to report that instructional time had remained the same, Mr. Jennings said. On last yearâs survey, the same districts may instead have acknowledged reducing the time, while characterizing the reduction as minimal, he said.

According to the new survey, the average change in instructional time in elementary schools since the lawâs enactment has been 140 additional minutes per week for reading, 87 additional minutes per week for math, 76 fewer minutes per week for social studies, 75 fewer minutes for science, 57 fewer minutes for art and 40 fewer minutes for gym.

In a statement, Secretary Spellings said the reportâs scope was âtoo limited to draw broad conclusions.â

âIn fact,â she said, âthere is much evidence that shows schools are adding time to the school day in order to focus on reading and math, not cutting time from other subjects.â

— Sam Dillon
New York Times
2007-07-25


INDEX OF NCLB OUTRAGES


FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of education issues vital to a democracy. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information click here. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.