Orwell Award Announcement SusanOhanian.Org Home

NCLB Outrages

Secretary of Education Criticizes Proposal

Ohanian Comment: We can agree with one thing Spellings says: We're on the run.

Remember: the enemy of your enemy is not necessarily your friend. Not that Spellings and Miller are actually enemies. They are allies to the mission of the Business Roundtable. All this bickering is strictly for show.

By Diana Jean Schemo

WASHINGTON, Sept. 5 â Education Secretary Margaret Spellings on Wednesday criticized a Congressional proposal to soften provisions of Presidentâs Bush signature education law, saying it would severely weaken the federal effort to raise achievement among poor and minority children.

In a speech before a business group and at a news conference, Ms. Spellings said that a series of proposals in draft legislation circulated by Democrats and Republicans on the House education committee, taken together, would allow states to remove children from testing regimes and tutoring services, and would make it too difficult for parents to know whether students and schools are making progress.

âItâs just too darn confusing,â Ms. Spellings said of the draft bill. âTo make it more complex, less transparent, more obfuscated I think would be a huge mistake, particularly when weâre on the run, weâre on the move.â

The No Child Left Behind Law, passed in 2002, requires schools to report annual test scores in reading and math for all children in grades three to eight, broken down by race, ethnicity and other factors. The law requires all students to reach proficiency in reading and math by 2014, and singles out schools that fail to make sufficient progress toward that goal for progressively more severe penalties.

Ms. Spellings weighed in as the House and Senate prepare to push the law to renewal this month. The House draft would preserve the goal of bringing students to proficiency by 2014 but would broaden the ways schools could demonstrate student progress.

Rather than relying solely on reading and math scores, schools could include tests in other subjects, attendance and graduation rates. It would also distinguish between schools that broadly fail to meet annual goals and those that fall slightly short.

Ms. Spellings complained that proposals to change various provisions of the law âcould be a significant retreat from accountability.â

Passing no bill at all this year, she added, would be preferable to passing one that dilutes the lawâs power because the current version stays in force until Congress passes a new law.

Still, Ms. Spellings, who has been campaigning all year for the lawâs renewal, avoided attacking the draft directly in her formal talk before an audience of business leaders and education advocates, and did so only in response to questions from reporters afterward. She also sent a letter detailing her criticisms to Congressional leaders.

In the letter she also criticized a provision of the draft, sought by states with large immigrant populations, that would allow schools to test non-English speakers in their native language for up to five years, instead of the current three. âThatâs simply too long,â she wrote, âthis would allow a third-grade student to reach the tenth grade before ever being tested in English.â

Speaking to the same group minutes before the education secretary, Representative George Miller, the California Democrat who is chairman of the education committee, said that he remained âstrongly committedâ to the principles of No Child Left Behind, but he said that the law needed more flexibility.

Representative Howard P. McKeon of California, the ranking Republican on the education committee, said he and other Republicans shared many of the secretaryâs concerns. âThings that weaken accountability and make the bill less than what it is right now, I donât think weâre interested in supporting,â Mr. McKeon said.

The education committee will hold hearings on the draft in the coming weeks and is trying for the full House to vote on a bill by monthâs end.

The Senate is also planning to release a bill updating No Child Left Behind this month.

— Diana Jean Schemo
New York Times


This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of education issues vital to a democracy. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information click here. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.