Dear Congressman Miller . . .
Congressman George Miller
House Committee on Education and Labor
Dear Congressman Miller,
You certainly make it difficult to contact your office. Are you responsive to the electorate?
I have read your statements on NCLB. You are not getting to the heart of the issues. I write from the democratic wing of the Democratic Party and I do not accept your present commitment to NCLB. It is a Republican bill, drafted by Republicans, and you are negotiating the margins.
The domination of school reform dialogue by conservative political forces and corporate financed institutes (1983- 2008) produced a shift in discussion of school issues away from equal opportunity and toward analysis of the Ă˘€śachievement gapĂ˘€ť the gap in scores between ethnic and economic groups. . The accountability movement stressed increased testing rather than relying upon teacher curriculum decision making. It is noticeable in this debate that the conservative policy advocates, both Republican and Democrats, did not have their children or grandchildren in low income schools where the curriculum and teaching has too often been reduced to drill and test. Their children are in middle class schools Ă˘€“ higher achieving schools- where the curriculum and teaching strategies remain more open, more child friendly, more divergent and where schools pursue multiple goals, not only improved test scores
In political terms this shifted responsibility for childrenĂ˘€™s educational achievement from the unequal government funding and placed it at the feet of teachers and education professionals while also demonizing teachersĂ˘€™ unions and other education professionals. The accountability and testing movement changed the educational debates away from discussion of democracy and multicultural education toward measuring achievement in math and reading. These shifts were not accidental nor are they politically neutral.
We are in a difficult situation; our studentsĂ˘€™ futures and the health of our democracy depend upon engaging in the struggle for democratic education. If we want democracy, we must educate for democracy. Democracy depends upon the participation of its members in the political, social, cultural and economic institutions. We do this through public schools. The current federal law, No Child left behind (NCLB) and most state school reform plans remove teachers, students and parents from active involvement in decision making about standards, testing, and curriculum, and restricts the decision making of elected school boards.
The fundamental issue is you need to start listening to teachers, not to "educational experts" who make their living by commenting on teachers' lives.
I will be publishing your response, or your lack of response, on my blog;
Dr. Duane E. Campbell
Choosing Democracy; a practical guide to multicultural education ( 2004) Merrill/Prentice Hall.
New edition written for 2009. It will comment on how the Democrats did, or did not, improve NCLB.
Dr. Duane E. Cambell
INDEX OF NCLB OUTRAGES