Orwell Award Announcement SusanOhanian.Org Home


NCLB Outrages

No Child Left Alive

A high school students shows the way. Why is the public (including teacher unions) so passive about this assault on the young?


by Daniel Mootz, Carlisle High School, Carlisle, PA

Picking the single most important issue for my generation seemed like an
impossible task. With thousands of worthwhile causes that inspire people to
act, I wanted to highlight one that affects my fellow high school students
directly. I also wanted to avoid partisan politics by choosing an issue that
many people could agree on.

I was stumped until one day the most important issue facing young people in
the upcoming election jumped out at me in the school hallway. Literally.

It was toward the middle of the 2006-07 school year when I was first
approached by a US military recruiter. I was 14 years old. Wearing a huge
grin and greeting me like an old friend, the recruiter gave a casual,
"What's up, man?" to lure me toward the Army table set up in the corner.

I could see that there was already a large crowd of students gathering
around the table, and so after convincing the soldier that I was not
interested in the Army, I walked to my next class. This experience bothered
me all day, yet no one else seemed concerned or ready to question the
presence of the US military in high schools, recruiting teenagers for war. I
decided to dig deeper, to find out how and why the military was targeting
high school students. What I learned was a wake-up call that something has
to change in this country before it's too late.

A quick Google search led me to the law that allows the US military to
recruit on all public school campuses; it is part of the infamous No Child
Left Behind Act. Ironic? Yes, but nevertheless there it was, in Section
9528, a section that was voted on by more than two-thirds of our Congress:

(3) SAME ACCESS TO STUDENTS.--Each local educational agency receiving
assistance under this Act shall provide military recruiters the same access
to secondary school students as is provided generally to post secondary
educational institutions or to prospective employers of those students.

I was floored. How can a bill whose stated purpose is to provide a better
education and give students more opportunities to learn and grow contain a
hidden section that does the exact opposite? The No Child Left Behind Act,
signed on January 8, 2002--right at the beginning of the "war on
terror"--began to seem more like a cover-up to recruit more troops from a
pool of students with no options and less like a heartfelt attempt to
conquer the education problem. The law also states that recruiters will have
the same access to high schools as colleges and employers do; the only
difference is that colleges and employers want students to finish four years
of secondary education, whereas the military encourages them to drop out.

But opposition to the law was minuscule, and politicians from both ends of
the political spectrum joined forces with the President to see that his
plans for public education were carried out. Perhaps it was the idea of not
supporting such a popular-sounding law that scared many politicians into
compliance. Regardless of the motives, the bill passed, and military
recruiters from all across the country found themselves trying to convince
teenagers, most of whom can not even drive yet, to pick up a gun and join
the Army.

To make matters worse, in 2005 the Army announced that it would allow high
school dropouts to enlist. Thus, the No Child Left Behind Act, advertised as
the means to a better educated public, actually provides students an
incentive to drop out of school. If the goal of the law is to expand
educational success rates of the nation's youth, why would the government
try to persuade students to join the Army if it means dropping out of school
to do so?

Already, thousands of high school students have enlisted as a direct result
of military recruiting in schools. And with matters escalating in the Middle
East, even those who joined as reservists are in danger of being deployed
for combat. Why is removing the military from all public school campuses the
most important issue facing young people today? Because my fellow classmates
are being targeted by our government for a war that has claimed, and will
continue to claim, the lives of thousands. Many of them have chosen to cut
short their education to serve, a decision that may end up cutting short
their lives.

In 2008 my generation needs to be aware of this deadly contradiction, and to
urge those old enough to vote to work together to eliminate the military
from our schools, protecting ourselves as well as generations to come.

— Daniel Mootz
The Nation online
2007-10-09
http://www.thenation.com/docprint.mhtml?i=20071022&s=mootz


INDEX OF NCLB OUTRAGES


FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of education issues vital to a democracy. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information click here. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.