Orwell Award Announcement SusanOhanian.Org Home


NCLB Outrages

Paved With Good Intentions: The Federal Role in the Oversight and Enforcement of the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) and the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB)

The paper summary is here. For the full paper go to the url below.

by Arun K. Ramanathan, Harvard Graduate School of Education and San Diego Unified School District

Context: The context for this article is the public response to the federal role in the oversight and enforcement of the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) and the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB). This response has been characterized by a tension between concerns about federal interference in public education and support for federal activism. Despite a number of similarities between the state and local responses to the two laws, research on the federal role in implementing NCLB has largely disregarded the long record of federal oversight and enforcement of IDEA.

Purpose: The purpose of this analytic essay is to address this omission through a comparative policy analysis of the oversight and enforcement mechanisms in IDEA and NCLB, the evolution of these mechanisms in the legislative process, their implementation by the Department of Education, and the interest group and academic responses to this implementation.

Research Design: The research design consists of a review of the statutes, Congressional documents, governmental reports, interest group position papers, policy analyses, press reports, and relevant academic literature. The author discusses the implications of this analysis for the future of the federal role in the oversight and enforcement of NCLB, and the recently reauthorized IDEA and the federal focus on improving educational outcomes. The author argues that the design of NCLBâs outcomes-based accountability model, combined with its dependence on the Department of Education to provide oversight and enforcement, has produced unintended consequences at the state level, including regulatory incoherence and incentives for âgaming the system.â He notes that similar problems can be projected for the implementation of the new outcomes-based oversight and enforcement model in IDEA 2004.

Recommendation: The author recommends that Congress turn the accountability model in NCLB âinside out,â establishing national standards, a single national performance assessment, fixed and achievable targets for proficiency, and predefined subgroup sizes while devolving responsibility for the details of the district- and school-level accountability system to the states. In IDEAâs case, he recommends setting national targets for a small number of outcome indicators while maintaining the current system of focused monitoring. He argues that this model, in combination with federal incentives for meeting performance targets, would provide for a more realistic and effective federal role in improving public education.

ARUN K. RAMANATHAN, Ed.D has worked in a variety of capacities with children and adults with disabilities and non-disabled students in public schools and community settings. He has published research on inclusive education, for-profit charter schools and special education consent decrees. He received his Ed.D from the Harvard Graduate School of Education in 2007 and is currently the Executive Director of Government Relations for the San Diego Unified School District. His research focuses on the intersection between special and general education policy.

— Arun K. Ramanathan
Teachers College Record
2008-02-05
http://www.tcrecord.org/AuthorDisplay.asp?aid=20226


INDEX OF NCLB OUTRAGES


FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of education issues vital to a democracy. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information click here. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.