Orwell Award Announcement SusanOhanian.Org Home

NCLB Outrages

‘No Child’ Law Is Not Closing a Racial Gap

Ohanian Comment: Has the poverty gap decreased? How to rewrite NCLB? Rewrite it as Leave No Family Without a Living Wage. Currently, NCLB puts money into the hands of corporate conglomerates and middle class people picking up tutoring money. This is how poverty programs usually work: Employ middle class people to tell poor people what to do. Never trust them with the money.

Stephen Krashen Comment:
National tests of reading, poverty, and libraries

Sent to the New York Times

Re: âNo Childâ Law Is Not Closing a Racial Gap,

The recent NAEP (National Assessment of Educational Progress) report provided pages of information about differences in reading achievement between Black and White students, Hispanic and White students, males and females, and private and public schools. Missing was any mention of the effect of poverty, a factor that has a much stronger impact on reading achievement than any of factors the report focused on.

Reading achievement depends largely on the amount of voluntary reading students do, not on race, gender, or private schooling. Children of poverty consistently score poorly on tests of reading and the reason is obvious: They have very little access to books and other reading material at home, in their communities and in their schools.

Omission of this factor is a mystery, especially because a lack of access to reading material can be dealt with easily and without great expense: Improve school and public libraries in high-poverty areas.

By Sam Dillon

The achievement gap between white and minority students has not narrowed in recent years, despite the focus of the No Child Left Behind law on improving the scores of blacks and Hispanics, according to results of a federal test considered to be the nation's best measure of long-term trends in math and reading proficiency.

Between 2004 and last year, scores for young minority students increased, but so did those of white students, leaving the achievement gap stubbornly wide, despite President George W. Bush's frequent assertions that the No Child law was having a dramatic effect.

Although Black and Hispanic elementary, middle and high school students all scored much higher on the federal test than they did three decades ago, most of those gains were not made in recent years, but during the desegregation efforts of the 1970s and 1980s. That was well before the 2001 passage of the No Child law, the official description of which is "An Act to Close the Achievement Gap."

"There's not much indication that N.C.L.B. is causing the kind of change we were all hoping for," said G. Gage Kingsbury, a testing expert who is a director at the Northwest Evaluation Association in Portland. "Trends after the law took effect mimic trends we were seeing before. But in terms of watershed change, that doesn't seem to be happening."

The results no doubt will stoke debate about how to rewrite the No Child law when the Obama administration brings it up for reauthorization later this year. Education Secretary Arne Duncan has said he would like to strengthen national academic standards, tighten requirements that high-quality teachers be distributed equally across schools in affluent and poor neighborhoods, and make other adjustments. "We still have a lot more work to do," Mr. Duncan said of the latest scores. But the long-term assessment results could invigorate those who challenge the law's accountability model itself.

Despite gains that both whites and minorities did make, the overall scores of the United States' 17-year-old students, averaged across all groups, were the same as those of teenagers who took the test in the early 1970s. This was largely due to a shift in demographics; there are now far more lower-scoring minorities in relation to whites. In 1971, the proportion of white 17-year-olds who took the reading test was 87 percent, while minorities were 12 percent. Last year, whites had declined to 59 percent while minorities had increased to 40 percent.

The scores of 9- and 13-year-old students, however, were up modestly in reading, and were considerably higher in math, since 2004, the last time the test was administered. And they were quite a bit higher than those of students of the same age a generation back. Still, the progress of younger students tapered off as they got older.

Some experts said the results proved that the No Child law had failed to make serious headway in lifting academic achievement. "We're lifting the basic skills of young kids,"said Bruce Fuller, an education professor at the University of California, Berkeley, "but this policy is not lifting 21st-century skills for the new economy."

But Margaret Spellings, Mr. Duncan's predecessor under President Bush, called the results a vindication of the No Child law.

It's not an accident that we're seeing the most improvement where N.C.L.B. has focused most vigorously," Ms. Spellings said. "The law focuses on math and reading in grades three through eight"; it's not about high schools. So these results are affirming of our accountability-type approach."

Whether anyone knows how to extend the results achieved with younger students through the turbulent high school years remains an open question.

The math and reading test, known as the National Assessment of Educational Progress, Long-Term Trends, was given to a nationally representative sample of 26,000 students last year. It was the 12th time since 1971 that the Department of Education administered a comparable test to students ages 9, 13 and 17. The scores, released on Tuesday in Washington, allow for comparisons of student achievement every few years back to the Vietnam and Watergate years.

The results point to the long-term crisis in many of the nation's high schools, and could lead to proposals for more federal attention to them in the rewrite of the No Child law, which requires states to administer annual tests in grades three to eight, but only once in high school.

The 2008 score gap between black and white 17-year-olds, 29 points in reading and 26 points in math, could be envisioned as the rough equivalent of between two and three school years' worth of learning, said Peggy Carr, an associate commissioner for assessment at the Department of Education.

Freeman A. Hrabowski III, the president of the University of Maryland, Baltimore County, who has written about raising successful black children, said the persistence of the achievement gap should lead policymakers to seek new ways to increase low-performing students' learning time.

"Where we see the gap narrowing, that's because there's been an emphasis on supplemental education, on after-school programs that encourage students to read more and do more math problems," Dr. Hrabowski said. "Where there are programs that encourage that additional work, students of color do the work and their performance improves and the gap narrows."

But he said that educators and parents pushing children to higher achievement often find themselves swimming against a tide of popular culture.

"Even middle-class students are unfortunately influenced by the culture that says it's simply not cool for students to be smart," he said. "And that is a factor here in these math and reading scores."

Michael Casserly, executive director of the Council of the Great City Schools, which represents more than 60 metropolitan school systems, said that much of the progress among the nation's minority students has been the result of hard work by urban educators, not only since the No Child law took effect but for decades before.

"N.C.L.B. did not invent the concept of the achievement gap--much of the desegregation work in the '70s and '80s was in fact about giving poor, Hispanic and African-American kids access to better resources and curriculum," Mr. Casserly said. "You do see from these results that in that period, the gains were steeper. It wasn't being called an achievement gap, but that was what that was about."

— Sam Dillon
New York Times


This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of education issues vital to a democracy. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information click here. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.