Orwell Award Announcement SusanOhanian.Org Home


NCLB Outrages

Study: No Child Left Behind sets schools up to fail

The study begins with this assertion: California’s academic standards are among the highest in the nation—so high, in fact, that very soon almost every public school in California will be labeled a failure under the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act. Although high academic goals are laudable, they must also be attainable. Not only does the current accountability system set almost every school up for failure, but it also evaluates schools by the level of student achievement, not by student gains. As a result, a school that inherits many high-achieving students but teaches them very little can be labeled a success, whereas a school that inherits many low-achieving students and teaches them a great deal can be labeled a failure.

As is typical of standardistos, the study accepts the tests on which students don't perform well as a given.

I once walked into a number of California banks and quizzed tellers and managers about a question on compounding interest from the California Exit Exam. Nobody could answer it. The question had a major flaw, insisting that interest is compounded annually, but besides that, why quiz students on a banking question that not even banking professionals can answer?

And that's just one question from the morass of inappropriate tests.


By Marie Lakin

A NEW STUDY from the Public Policy Institute of California predicts that a majority of the state's schools will fail to reach No Child Left Behind's impossibly high goals for Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) next year. "Very soon almost every public school in California will be labeled a failure," the study's authors write.

The program mandates that schools and districts receiving Title I federal funds make satisfactory yearly improvement toward an established individual goal in math and English. A school which consistently misses its goal over several years is eventually subject to major restructuring. These efforts are costly and their success has been mixed.

The study identified many factors behind its findings but suggested that the larger problem is a system which does not account for the significant differences in challenges between schools. "Fifty percent of elementary schools with the highest share of low-income students made AYP in 2007, whereas 98 percent of elementary schools with the lowest share of low-income students made AYP," according to the PPIC.

"As a result, a school that inherits many high-achieving students but teaches them very little can be labeled a success, whereas a school that inherits many low-achieving students and teaches them a great deal can be labeled a failure," the authors write. California has a high percentage of disadvantaged students.

The situation will not likely improve given the economy and severe cutbacks and larger class sizes California's schools face next year as a result of state budget negotiations.

WHAT CAN BE DONE besides a complete overhaul of the NCLB rules? The study makes many worthwhile suggestions:

â€Â¢ Invest in preschool. High-quality programs can help close the achievement gap.

â€Â¢ Re-evaluate programs which are not working. The study points to a remedial program for students who have failed the high school exit exam as one which has been ineffective, yet the current budget allocates $73 million to it.

â€Â¢ New, innovative programs which work should be nurtured, piloted and implemented statewide.

â€Â¢ Reform school finance by replacing it with a weighted formula more closely tied to the actual costs of educating students. Schools which have more students from low socioeconomic background should naturally receive more funding, but those with higher regional costs should also receive more dollars.

While few would argue that many reforms are needed in California's education system, NCLB has had an unhealthy effect on the education community nationwide, something Education Secretary Arne Duncan told the American Federation of Teachers conference last week.

"This idea of labeling and stigmatizing schools as failures -- it is unbelievably demoralizing to faculty; it's confusing to parents."

— Marie Lakin
Ventura County Star
2009-07-17
http://blogs.venturacountystar.com/mlakin/archives/2009/07/study-no-child-left-behind-set.html


INDEX OF NCLB OUTRAGES


FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of education issues vital to a democracy. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information click here. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.