Orwell Award Announcement SusanOhanian.Org Home


NCLB Outrages

Schwarzenegger's plan would reshape education in California

This article is typical in that it cites the big bad unions as the opponents of Arne. Noticed how they are pictured: not "concerned" but "powerful." And all those who favor the plan can say is that it's worth a lot of money. Don't let this outrage go unanswered. Let the LA Times know what you think:

letters@latimes.com.

In your letter, please include your full name, mailing address, daytime phone number, and e-mail address.

More important, California residents, let your local politicos know what you think. The time is now!

And of course this same theme is being played out across the country.

Here's an excellent comment/letter by Duane E. Campbell.

The Governor argues that California must not let federal money slip away for school reform and that we must alter California law on the use of test results to evaluate teachers.

The problem with this position is that that writers and policy makers do not understand the tests nor their results. All STAR and NAEP exams are in English. Some 1,600,000 California students are English Language Learners. At least half of these students are at low level of English learning.

If you do not speak a language well, taking a test in that language is not a valid measure of your knowledge. ELL students score more than 25 % below native English speakers on these tests. Decades of research show that tests given in a language the student does not understand are invalid and unreliable measures of the students̢۪ achievement.

In many classrooms up to 1/3 of the students are English Language Learners. If you use these test results to measure the teachers or the schools, teachers working with ELL students will always score low. To use these scores to evaluate teachers would be unfair, inaccurate, and poorly informed.

Dr. Duane E. Campbell
Professor of Education (emeritus)
CSU Sacramento

By Jason Song and Jason Felch

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger called on legislators Thursday to adopt sweeping education reforms that would dramatically reshape California's public education system and qualify the state for competitive federal school funding.

The governor's proposed legislation, to be considered during a special session that ends by Oct. 5, was met almost immediately by criticism from the powerful state teacher unions, which called Schwarzenegger's plans rushed and unnecessary.

While Schwarzenegger's goal is to boost California's chances to qualify for $4.35 billion in federal grants, known as "Race to the Top," many of his proposals go far beyond those needed for eligibility, and embrace the Obama administration's key education reform proposals.

Schwarzenegger's reforms include: *Adopting a merit pay system that would reward effective teachers and give them incentives to work at low-performing campuses;

* Abolishing the current cap on the number of charter schools that can open every year;

* Forcing school districts to shut down or reconstitute the lowest-performing schools or turn them over to charter schools' independent management;

* Allowing students at low-performing campuses to transfer to a school of their choosing;

* Requiring school districts to consider student test data when evaluating teachers, something the federal government believes is prohibited under state law.

In recent months, the Obama administration has repeatedly criticized California for failing to take the lead on reform efforts, and has singled out for scorn the state's ban on linking test scores to teachers' performance. Federal officials have said that California would be ineligible for funding if that law wasn't changed.

But in an interview Wednesday, U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan praised Schwarzenegger's moves as "courageous" and said they could transform the state into a national model for reform.

"This is a very significant step that absolutely has national implications," Duncan said. "The eyes of the country are going to be on California."

Several other states, including Illinois and Indiana, have changed their laws or policies to comply with federal guidelines, but Schwarzenegger's proposal "goes way beyond what other states are doing," said Baron Rodriguez of the Data Quality Center, which tracks national educational data.

The regular legislative session is scheduled to end Sept. 11, and Schwarzenegger said he wanted lawmakers to finish their work on education by early October to comply with the deadline for the first round of Race to the Top funding this winter.

But lawmakers probably will face heavy resistance from the state's teacher unions, which criticized Schwarzenegger's proposal for caving to federal demands.

At the heart of the proposal is an effort to require districts that want a piece of the federal funding to begin evaluating California teachers and schools not just by their students' achievement of a specific goal, but by their individual improvement year to year. That approach, referred to as "value-added" analysis, measures students against themselves to evaluate the effect a teacher or school has on growth.

"It's not a hammer or a gotcha," said Jim Lanich, director of the California State University's Center to Close the Achievement Gap, who cautioned that other factors besides scores should also be used in evaluation. "It tells us what is working and how we can replicate that."

But teacher unions have resisted the use of student performance for evaluation, and successfully asked for it to be banned at the state level in 2006 legislation. They are expected to fight Schwarzenegger's efforts to undo that ban, a key demand of the Obama administration.

'Intense debate'

The state, said Marty Hittelman, president of the 100,000-member California Federation of Teachers, should not mandate how local districts use student data.

And Dean Vogel, vice president of the 340,000-member California Teachers Assn., the state's largest, said the proposals weren't well thought out.

"If you're really serious about reform, it demands intense debate among the stakeholders," he said. "The way it's unfolding is rushed."

Some of the proposals would have little more than symbolic effect, educators and others said. State officials said local districts always have had the authority to evaluate teachers based on student performance, although few do.

And although the state puts a cap on new charter campuses each year under current law, it is unlikely that charters would reach that limit, which is now at 1,350.

Hittelman called the proposals a "knee-jerk reaction" and cited a recent study that showed, as a whole, charter schools do not perform better than regular campuses. Charter schools are independently run but publicly funded.

Schwarzenegger is "relying on ideas that haven't been proven to work and force them on everyone," Hittelman said.

Controversy

Other proposals will force the state's Democratic lawmakers to confront the unions, among their most ardent supporters.

Historically, the state has blocked important education reform efforts, said Joe Williams of Democrats for Education Reform, a New York-based political action committee. But there have never been so many federal dollars at stake.

"Saying no to this proposal means saying no to a big chunk of money," Williams said. "California is going to be the grand-daddy of fights."

— Jason Song and Jason Felch
Los Angeles Times
2009-08-21
latimes.com/news/local/la-me-gov-schools21-2009aug21,0,3649380.story latimes.com


INDEX OF NCLB OUTRAGES


FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of education issues vital to a democracy. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information click here. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.