Orwell Award Announcement SusanOhanian.Org Home


NCLB Outrages

Delaware, Tennessee 'win' educational grants

Ohanian Comment: One thing to remember: This is not "federal" money, pulled out of Arne Duncan's pocket. These are taxpayer dollars, pulled out of our pockets. Which do you think stands a better chance of improving children's school success:

  • Tying teacher's job to standardized test scores

  • Giving every family of a schoolchild in Delaware $11,563 and every Tennessee family $7,756


  • My point here is that corporate politicos refuse to acknowledge that deep poverty is the major cause of children's school problems. But it's easier to blame teachers than to address the real problem of parents not earning a living wage.

    By Greg Toppo

    In a move that could push educators nationwide to try new ΓΆ€” and sometimes untested ΓΆ€” school reforms, Delaware and Tennessee won a cash windfall Monday from the Obama administration by dumping limits on charter schools, tying teacher evaluations to student test scores and taking drastic measures to turn around persistently struggling schools.

    Saying the two had agreed to reforms that were "touching every single child" in their schools, U.S. Education Secretary Arne Duncan announced that the pair would share about $600 million this spring. They beat out 38 other states and the District of Columbia in the long-anticipated first round of his Race to the Top competitive grant.

    FIRING TEACHERS: First step to reform or useless effort?
    VIDEO: Obama discusses Race to the Top

    Part of the larger federal stimulus plan, most of its $4.35 billion eventually could reach as many as 17 states and affect millions of children. But in the first round, tiny Delaware will get $100 million; Tennessee will get $500 million. Together the two states enroll slightly more students than New York City.

    Speaking to reporters Monday, Duncan said Round II would feature as many as 15 states, which will be announced in September. "We want to fund as many strong proposals as possible," he said.

    Though the money will surely help the cash-strapped schools, perhaps the bigger influence will be on states pushing to compete for Round II this fall. President Obama wants Congress to make the grant a permanent part of the budget, and already many observers say the dash for cash has pushed states to change long-standing laws that crimped innovation.

    "There's been more action, real action, in the last year than in any time I can remember," says Charlie Barone of Democrats for Education Reform. The two winning states have done "all the things that people say you should do that aren't sexy." Delaware, for example, has aligned academic standards with curriculum, teacher training and testing. Tennessee lawmakers met in special session last summer to remove a cap on the number of privately run, publicly funded charter schools it allows each year.

    But the reforms aren't slam-dunks, says Tom Loveless, a Brookings Institution researcher who found earlier this month that school turnarounds "can be done, but the odds are daunting." He examined 1,156 California schools over a 20-year period and calculated that the odds of a poorly performing school rising to the top in 20 years were about one in 70. The findings, he says, suggest that "people who say we know how to make failing schools into successful ones but merely lack the will to do so are selling snake oil."

    SMALLER STATES MEAN MORE MONEY PER STUDENT

    The first round of Race to the Top funding will go to only two states neither of them particularly large. As a result, both could see a significant rise in per-pupil spending.
    State Number of students Funding amount Per child amount Current spending
    Delaware 126,800 $100 million $788.64 $11,563
    Tennessee 930,500 $500 million $537.35 $7,756

    — Greg Toppo
    USA Today
    2010-03-30
    http://www.usatoday.com/news/education/2010-03-29-race-top-grants_N.htm


    INDEX OF NCLB OUTRAGES


    FAIR USE NOTICE
    This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of education issues vital to a democracy. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information click here. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.