Orwell Award Announcement SusanOhanian.Org Home


NCLB Outrages

States Create Flood of Education Bills

When someone is called a school "reformer" these days, you know there's trouble ahead. And here's proof that when someone is billed as an education adviser to President Obama, that trouble is likely to be disastrous. In Jon Schnur we have another Ivy League elitist who thinks public school principals and teachers aren't smart enough to be in charge. . . and so he comes up with schemes to get rid of them.


Jon Schnur: Chief Executive Officer and co-founder of New Leaders for New Schools; Special Assistant to Secretary of Education Richard Riley, President Clinton's White House Associate Director for Educational Policy; Senior Adviser on Education to Vice President Gore; adviser to President Barack Obama, he played a pivotal role in writing the federal stimulus plan for schools. He spearheaded the development of many educational policies in such areas as teacher recruitment and training, after-school programs, school reform and charter schools.

Princeton University 1989 (classmate of Wendy Kopp); New Leaders for New Schools was founded in 2000, emerging from the business plan written by Schnur while taking coursework at the Graduate School of Education, the Business School and John F. Kennedy School of Government.

Jon Schnur is to Race to the Top what Sandy Kress was to No Child Left Behind.

Notable Comment: [Having] more Teach For America corps members who stay in education in some way and continue to play significant leadership roles—whether at the classroom level, the principal level, the school-system level— and devote years and years of their lives in order to help build the capacity of our school systems and communities to deliver a great education for kids, is really crucial.-- One Day Teach for America Alumni Magazine, Winter 2009

Notable Comment:President Obama and Secretary Arne Duncan are extraordinary champions and leaders who are helping our nation invest in our future and dramatically improve education. I have been so honored to advise and support them over the past several months during my leave of absence from New Leaders. This experience has confirmed for me what drove me to create and lead New Leaders in the first place. First, that breakthrough success in education is urgently needed and possible. Second, there is nothing more important in education than demonstrating and codifying how the breakthrough results that have happened in individual classrooms and schools can happen at unprecedented scale for our students in greatest need.—Gotham Schools, May 1, 2009

Affirmation: First, I'm not the only one who thinks Jon Schnur has a real shot at being the next education secretary; he's turning into a bona fide superstar. Second, it's pretty amazing that a far-left party for Obama would feature an education reformer like Schnur. . . .—Mike Petrilli Thomas B. Fordham Institute Flypaper, Oct. 6, 2008

Refutation: Schnur continues by lecturing us about the "data" - in reality, a bunch of applications divided up on a 500-point rubric and added together with four-function math that Schnur masquerades as a distant cousin of multivariate calculus. Secretary Duncan agrees that critics have "misread [the administration's] intent" by simply pointing out that states generating the most points, including on that specific section on "buy-in" cited by Andy Smarick, stand the best chance at winning RTTT funds.

A clear message to Mr. Schnur and Secretary Duncan: The intellectual dishonesty stops here.--Matthew K. Tabor, Education Strategist and Media Consultant, Independent Consultancy, National Journal, May 6, 2010

--from forthcoming book An ABC of What You Need to Know About Public School Deformers.


NOTE: Following the forced ousting of Vermont principals, Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders, who serves on the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, & Pensions, has taken to calling Obama/Duncan policy scapegoating. Maybe it's a term that will catch on.

Also note the role the AFT played in this outrage. Stop paying dues to this organizationl.


By Sam Dillon

DENVER — Democrats backed by the state's largest teachers' union nicknamed legislation overhauling Colorado's tenure and evaluation rules the "teacher scapegoat" bill, and several lawmakers wept in public sessions during their monthlong battle to stop it.

But other Democrats joined with Republicans to pass Colorado's law, the most comprehensive of a dozen similar bills passed around the nation this year, in part to increase states' chances in a $4 billion federal grant competition.

Louisiana, Oklahoma and New York also approved bills modifying their tenure and evaluation rules in the last week, just in time to meet Tuesday's application deadline for Round 2 of the competition, known as Race to the Top.

This flood of legislation, along with new rules in many states allowing for more charter schools, pioneering union contracts in several cities and a state-led effort to rewrite the nation's academic standards, have made this spring a watershed period, said Jon Schnur, an education adviser to the Obama campaign who helped design Race to the Top.

“It’s been one of the most important seasons for education reform in American history,” Mr. Schnur said.

Colorado’s law, passed last month, requires that school principals evaluate teachers’ classroom effectiveness each year, and that at least half of their rating be tied to student achievement. The law withholds tenure until rookie teachers have taught effectively for three years, and says tenured teachers performing poorly for two years in a row can lose job security and be fired.

It reflects an emerging national consensus on the importance of studying teachers’ work before giving job security or raises, said Timothy Daly, president of the New Teacher Project, a nonprofit group that published a report last year calling attention to weaknesses in teacher evaluation systems. In most school districts, virtually all teachers, good or bad, routinely get a satisfactory evaluation, it found.

In Race to the Top’s 500-point scoring system, states can earn at least 58 points for developing more robust evaluation systems and using them to make staffing decisions, like who should get tenure.

The two winners of the competition’s first round in March — Delaware, which won $100 million, and Tennessee, which won $500 million — scored highly for well-developed evaluation systems. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan has said he will award the remaining $3.4 billion to “10 to 15” states in the second round, with finalists announced in August.

Not all states are competing. Ten decided not to participate in Round 1, including Texas, which called the competition a federal intrusion on its right to set education policies. In recent weeks, Alaska and Kansas cited similar reasons as they pulled out of Round 2. Indiana and Minnesota also quit the race, saying they could not overcome teachers’ union opposition to school initiatives they said would have been crucial to their chances.

But with states across the nation facing huge budget shortfalls, governors, legislators, mayors and educators in about three dozen states have been working to win Race to the Top money by bringing their school policies in line with President Obama’s education agenda.

In several states, the process has produced conflict. In Rhode Island, a school board seeking to follow administration policies on failing schools fired all 87 teachers at its high school, provoking protests. Eventually the teachers agreed to teach a longer school day, and a settlement allowed them to keep their jobs.

In Florida, teacher protests over a bill that would have linked teacher pay to student test scores and eliminated the tenure system for all newly hired teachers persuaded Gov. Charlie Crist, a Republican, to veto it in April.

Colorado’s debate over the same themes was just as passionate, partly because thousands of teacher layoffs are on the horizon here, and teacher effectiveness will be considered before seniority in deciding who gets pink slips once the new law takes effect in 2014.

The politics of the debate here, which divided both Democrats and unionized teachers over how to handle school overhaul issues, could resonate in Congress when Mr. Obama seeks to rewrite the main federal law on public schools.

The Colorado law’s author, State Senator Mike Johnston, an alumnus of Teach for America who worked on the Obama campaign, rallied support from business executives, civil rights leaders and many school groups. But the Colorado Education Association — the state’s biggest teachers’ union, representing 40,000 teachers — persuaded most Democratic lawmakers to oppose it.

The union fought the bill because it would diminish teachers’ tenure protections, and because teachers resented the argument that Colorado had to pass the bill so as not to jeopardize the state’s chances in Race to the Top, said Deborah Fallin, an association spokeswoman.

“First we tried to kill it, and then we tried to fix it” by adding amendments, Ms. Fallin said.

Dennis Van Roekel, president of the National Education Association, the largest national teachers' union, which is the Colorado association's parent, testified against the bill here in April.

"President Obama has said that he wants to reform education by working with educators, not doing it to them," Mr. Van Roekel said. "What is being proposed here today is the opposite."

But Brenda Smith, president of the Colorado affiliate of the other national union, the American Federation of Teachers, was negotiating amendments, including establishment of an appeals process when teachers lose tenure because of two years of "ineffective" ratings.

Ms. Smith eventually endorsed the bill, and so did Randi Weingarten, the federation's national president.

"Why not be in the forefront of change instead of letting other people do it to you?" Ms. Smith said.

Although Ms. Smith's affiliate represents only one sizable Colorado district, with 2,500 members in Denver's southern suburbs, Mr. Johnston said its endorsement helped persuade Democrats. "A.F.T. support was a game changer," he said.

In the final voting, most of the Democrats in the General Assembly voted against the bill, but every single Republican in both chambers voted for it, along with Democrats who call themselves education reformers.

Representative Judy Solano, a Democrat who was a classroom teacher for 29 years, voted against.

"The bill made teachers the scapegoats for all the inadequacies of public education," Ms. Solano said.

But Representative Christine Scanlan, a Democrat who co-sponsored the bill, said it was not unfair to teachers because, among other reasons, it provided new avenues for them and their schools to improve instruction.

"Changing course in education is slow, like turning a tanker," Ms. Scanlan said. But out of concern over the crisis in public education, she said, "Colorado decided to do something significant, fast."

— Sam Dillon
New York Times
2010-06-01
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/01/education/01educ.html?emc=tnt&tntemail0=y


INDEX OF NCLB OUTRAGES


FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of education issues vital to a democracy. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information click here. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.