Orwell Award Announcement SusanOhanian.Org Home

NCLB Outrages

Let's agree on what we agree on and get that done”— U.S. Sen. Al Franken

Ohanian Comment: So much for hoping Al Franken would be an asset on the Education Committee. He thinks periodic tests done on computer will improve instruction. And thereby reveals he knows nothing about the issue.

Give that man some more Kool-Aid.

by Joe Natan

Joe Nathan Column -- Change is coming from Washington D.C., change that will have an impact on every U.S. public school in the United States.

That was clear when Arne Duncan, US Secretary of Education and Al Franken, one of Minnesotaâs U.S. Senators, spoke to several hundred Minnesotans last week. They were discussing school leadership and possible revisions in the federal "No Child Left Behind (NCLB)" law. Both were part of a panel at Dayton's Bluff Elementary School in St. Paul.

Both officials are eager to see changes in the law. As Franken put it, "Let's agree on what we agree on, and get that done!"

U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan, left, and Sen. Al Franken, right, were part of an education panel last Monday at Dayton's Bluff Elementary School in St. Paul. (Photos courtesy of Joan Arbisi Little, Center for School Change)

Duncan and Franken, who sits on a U.S. Senate Committee that deals with education issues, emphasized that NCLB must change. As Duncan put it, "We can't afford to have a law that is an impediment to progress." Part of the push for revision is because the law

  • Insists that 100 percent of a schoolâs students must be proficient by 2014. Almost everyone agrees will not happen unless the standards for proficiency are quite low.

  • Creates a list of schools in each state that need improvement. Some schools have been placed on the "needs improvement" list because students with special needs have not made enough improvement.

  • Sen. Franken described a constant theme he hears when visiting schools throughout Minnesota: "We have to change NCLB and we have to do it soon." Another consistent comment he hears is that Minnesota's current statewide testing program is not especially helpful for students, families or educators. That's because results of the statewide reading, writing and math tests don't arrive in schools until summer, after the school year ended.

    Franken believes that a better approach comes via tests given on a computer. In many cases, those results are available almost instantly. That means teachers can share the results with students and families during the school year. Teachers also can use results to modify what they are doing. If all or most students show they understand an idea or have mastered the skill, the teacher can move on. If not, more attention needs to be given.

    Computers and other technology also can help teachers individualize instruction for students. But whether the computer is used to help students learn, or help measure what students have learned, a school needs to have enough computers and access to high speed Internet.

    Both Franken and Duncan emphasized the importance of rewarding schools that show improvements in student achievement. They also want to see greater clarity on what students should be learning, and greater autonomy at the school level for how teachers help students achieve these goals. Based on comments I've read from Minnesota Congressman John Kline, a Republican who chairs the House of Representatives Education and Workforce Committee, there is bipartisan agreement on those ideas.

    Duncan and Franken hope that the NCLB revisions can be completed before the 2011-12 school year starts. I hope this happens. A clearer, wiser law will help reduce frustration and increase learning. Franken is right: "Letâs agree on what we agree on, and get this done!"

    — Joe Nathan
    EMC Publications


    This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of education issues vital to a democracy. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information click here. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.