Orwell Award Announcement SusanOhanian.Org Home


NCLB Outrages

Educating Voters

Ohanian Comment: Both Washington Post editorial writers and John Kerry join the Bush administration in marching behind the Business Roundtable plan of inflicting a scripted curriculum on the nation's schoolchildren. A curriculum of test prep will turn us into a nation of zombies. And that's the point. The Global Economy needs a lot of subservient workers who've been trained, since kindergarten, to believe that they don't measure up to society's high standards.

Read more about it in Why Is Corporate America Bashing Our Public Schools? by Kathy Emery and Susan Ohanian (Heinemann). Jonathan Kozol calls it "an extraordinary book."


HISTORICALLY, education was a tricky issue for presidential candidates, because the most important decisions about education -- funding, hiring, content -- are made by local politicians. But the Bush administration's No Child Left Behind law, one of the most aggressive recent federal interventions into education, has made schools into a live issue. By turning the law's name into a symbol of hypocrisy during the Democratic primaries, Howard Dean made the subject unavoidable.

That doesn't make it easy. For Sen. John F. Kerry, in fact, education policy presents a minefield. On the one hand, his Senate record shows that he has long favored accountability for schools and higher training standards for teachers. He also comes from a state, Massachusetts, that has successfully brought in a high school graduation exam and has used testing data to focus educational spending more narrowly on the children who need it most. These factors probably explain why he voted for the No Child law, which was supposed to require both accountability and standards. At the same time, teachers unions, which are major supporters of the Democratic Party, have made no secret of their dislike of the law and their wish to see it radically changed or repealed.

Perhaps as a result, Mr. Kerry's campaign has produced a gaggle of proposals that contain much that is interesting, but much that is open to interpretation as well. On paper, or through his advisers, he says that he still supports No Child Left Behind in principle but that he would change its implementation -- which we agree has been botched -- and increase school funding in practice. One major proposal would provide $30 billion for teachers, to be spent on salaries, training and incentives for those who work in the toughest schools (with money to come from a repeal of the presidents' tax cuts for upper brackets). If the money is spent well, it could make a big difference, pushing states toward hiring more qualified teachers; research shows that improving teacher qualifications improves schools. But money alone can't ensure that that happens, as Mr. Kerry seems to know. On paper, his education proposals state clearly that higher pay and better incentives would be accompanied by "rigorous tests for all new teachers," as well as rules that would "ensure schools can replace teachers who perform poorly."

In person, Mr. Kerry sometimes sounds a different note. Asked this week in Washington about new federal testing regimes and accountability standards, he described them as "punitive," a charge that doesn't exactly shore up public confidence in the new system, or increase schools' incentives to raise standards. He both supported testing -- "we have to know kids are learning" -- and in the same sentence said it was necessary to look at "the other factors by which you measure a child's progress," whatever that means. He also talked less about raising teaching standards, and more about not forcing teachers who have been teaching for 20 years to "go back and be recertified." Needless to say, on the campaign trail he rarely mentions the importance of firing weak teachers.

There is a pattern here. If Mr. Kerry's sometimes fierce rhetoric questioning the value of trade is matched by what his aides say is quiet support for trade, perhaps it is no surprise that his sometimes harsh vocal opposition to accountability standards also appears to be matched by quiet support for them. Maybe that's just what happens during a political campaign -- but it would help Mr. Kerry later if he worked harder on building constituencies for difficult issues now.

— Editorial
Washington Post
2004-08-09
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A50861-2004Aug8.html?referrer=email


INDEX OF NCLB OUTRAGES


FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of education issues vital to a democracy. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information click here. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.