Orwell Award Announcement SusanOhanian.Org Home


NCLB Outrages

Education Law Goes Overboard


Some aspects of the federal No Child Left Behind education law seem to have been written without attention to common sense. An example is the provision that prohibits school districts that fail to make adequate academic progress for three years from providing free tutoring to students with federal Title I money.

You read that correctly. Students who need tutoring the most must find help outside the school system. Even highly qualified tutors with special degrees, reading certification and years of teaching experience will not be eligible to tutor students if they work in a school system that has failed to meet the rigid standards of student performance.

The reason? According to a U.S. Department of Education spokesman, to allow personnel from substandard schools to tutor students would be akin to allowing the fox to guard the henhouse. What a negative view of the
teaching profession!

The government's reasoning is that if a school district is unable to raise student achievement with the amount of federal money it is granted, then it's not equipped to offer tutoring services after school.

This is flat-out illogical. Any child would benefit from one-on-one instruction of the type he would get from a qualified tutor he knows and trusts.

Anyone who thinks students fail to do well on standardized tests solely because their teachers are not doing enough is na´ve. The chief indicator of failure is poverty, which is why most city school districts will acutely feel the pain of this provision.

If, as expected, the entire Hartford school system is designated as underachieving, all of its certified tutors will be rendered ineligible. Schools will have to hire tutors from private or nonprofit organizations, some less qualified or experienced, in order to provide this necessary service. Exceptions will be made for students who have learning disabilities or language difficulties. In the event no private tutors can be found to serve these special circumstances, school districts will have dispensation to use federal money. Ironically, teachers from the underachieving system would be permitted to tutor students in those schools if they affiliate with a private contractor to provide those services.

How does putting struggling schools through such arbitrary rigmarole help students? As it stands, only a third of Hartford parents took
advantage of free tutoring for their children right in school, at home or on Saturdays. Making the system harder to navigate will not produce better test scores or improve learning.





— Editorial
Hartford Courant
2004-10-13
http://www.ctnow.com/news/opinion/editorials/hc-notutor.artoct13,1,2870245.story?coll=hc-headlines-editorials


INDEX OF NCLB OUTRAGES


FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of education issues vital to a democracy. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information click here. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.