Orwell Award Announcement SusanOhanian.Org Home


Why is California spending 1.25 billion to implement the common core?

Susan Notes:


This was sent to the Monterey Herald (CA), June 14. I am double posting as a letter and research because this is the research the media ignores.

by Stephen Krashen

We are told we need new standards and tests because American students do poorly compared to other countries. But the major reason for our unspectacular school achievement is our level of child poverty, now 23%, the second highest level among 35 "economically advanced" countries (23.5% in California). Poverty has a devastating impact on school performance. When we control for poverty, American students' test scores are near the top of the world.

We are told more rigorous standards and tests will improve school performance. Research does not support this assertion.

There is, however, strong evidence that protecting children from the effects of poverty will increase school performance: Strengthening food and health care programs, and providing more support for libraries and librarians is a much better investment than the common core. (California ranks near the bottom of the country in school library quality and availability of credentialed librarians; both are related to reading achievement.)

Instead of dealing with the real problem, the common core offers us, as Susan Ohanian puts it, "a radical untried curriculum overhaul and . . . nonstop national testing," something we don't need at a price we can't afford.

Child Poverty rate: UNICEF, 2007. An Overview of Child-Well Being in Rich Countries. UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre, Report Card 7. The United Nations Childrens Fund).
California child poverty:
http://thenextgeneration.org/files/Prosperity_Threatened_FIN.pdf

Control for poverty: Carnoy, M and Rothstein, R. 2013, What Do International Tests Really Show Us about U.S. Student Performance. Washington DC: Economic Policy Institute. 2012. http://www.epi.org/).

"There is no evidence standards and tests have improved student learning: Nichols, S., Glass, G., and Berliner, D. 2006. High-stakes testing and student achievement: Does accountability increase student learning? Education Policy Archives 14(1).

OECD. Tienken, C., 2011. Common core standards: An example of data-less decision-making. Journal of Scholarship and Practice. American Association of School Administrators [AASA], 7(4): 3-18.

"Strengthening food programs, increasing health care, providing more access to books": Berliner, D. 2009. Poverty and Potential: Out-of-School Factors and School Success. Boulder and Tempe: Education and the Public Interest Center & Education Policy Research Unit. Krashen, S., Lee, SY, and McQuillan, J. 2012. Is The Library Important? Multivariate Studies at the National and International Level Journal of Language and Literacy Education: 8(1).

"... a radical untried curriculum overhaul and . . . nonstop national testing" Susan Ohanian, Woo-Hoo! Occupy the Schools.

"The Common Core Standards and Assessments are something you can't use at a price you can't afford." Susan Ohanian

— Stephen Krashen
website
2013-07-14
http://skrashen.blogspot.com/2013/06/why-is-california-spending-125-billion.html?spref=fb


INDEX OF RESEARCH THAT COUNTS


FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of education issues vital to a democracy. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information click here. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.