School starting age: the evidence
Susan Notes: I'm struck by this contrast:
Jan 19, 2010 Applications for funding for Phase one of the $4.35 billion US Department of Education Race to the Top plan were due.
On 12 May 2011, the European Parliament adopted a resolution on Early Years Learning in
the European Union,which notes that the early years of childhood are critical for childrenâ€™s
development and highlights that 'in addition to education, all children have the right to rest,
leisure and play.'
Reader Comment: Formal learning is done to control children in a classroom setting and has nothing to do with what is best for the child.
Reader Comment: Capitalist or communist... same difference, ultimately, as both are economic systems that emphasize production and growth rather than people and sustainability. I think it's important to recognize this, because I think that for education to move in the direction that it needs to, we need to stop associating this view or that view with "left" or "right." Play-based ECE running later, experiential learning in middle years, connectivist learning in senior years will be good for people and economics and the planet, no matter what the political milieu.
by David Whitebread
In England children now start formal schooling, and the formal teaching of literacy and numeracy at the age of four. A recent letter signed by around 130 early childhood education experts, including myself, published in the Daily Telegraph (11 Sept 2013) advocated an extension of informal, play-based pre-school provision and a delay to the start of formal 'schooling' in England from the current effective start until the age of seven (in line with a number of other European countries who currently have higher levels of academic achievement and child well-being).
This is a brief review of the relevant research evidence which overwhelmingly supports a later start to formal education. This evidence relates to the >a href="http://www.cam.ac.uk/research/news/music-of-kindness-playing-together-strengthens-empathy-in-children"> contribution of playful experiences to children's development as learners, and the consequences of starting formal learning at the age of four to five years of age
There are several strands of evidence which all point towards the importance of play in young childrenÃ¢€™s development, and the value of an extended period of playful learning before the start of formal schooling. These arise from anthropological, psychological, neuroscientific and educational studies. Anthropological studies of childrenÃ¢€™s play in extant hunter-gatherer societies, and evolutionary psychology studies of play in the young of other mammalian species, have identified play as an adaptation which evolved in early human social groups. It enabled humans to become powerful learners and problem-solvers. Neuroscientific studies have shown that playful activity leads to synaptic growth, particularly in the frontal cortex, the part of the brain responsible for all the uniquely human higher mental functions.
In my own area of experimental and developmental psychology, studies have also consistently demonstrated the superior learning and motivation arising from playful, as opposed to instructional, approaches to learning in children. Pretence play supports childrenÃ¢€™s early development of symbolic representational skills, including those of literacy, more powerfully than direct instruction. Physical, constructional and social play supports children in developing their skills of intellectual and emotional Ã¢€˜self-regulationÃ¢€™, skills which have been shown to be crucial in early learning and development. Perhaps most worrying, a number of studies have documented the loss of play opportunities for children over the second half of the 20th century and demonstrated a clear link with increased indicators of stress and mental health problems.
Within educational research, a number of longitudinal studies have demonstrated superior academic, motivational and well-being outcomes for children who had attended child-initiated, play-based pre-school programmes. One particular study of 3,000 children across England, funded by the Department for Education themselves, showed that an extended period of high quality, play-based pre-school education was of particular advantage to children from disadvantaged households.
Studies have compared groups of children in New Zealand who started formal literacy lessons at ages 5 and 7. Their results show that the early introduction of formal learning approaches to literacy does not improve childrenÃ¢€™s reading development, and may be damaging. By the age of 11 there was no difference in reading ability level between the two groups, but the children who started at 5 developed less positive attitudes to reading, and showed poorer text comprehension than those children who had started later. In a separate study of reading achievement in 15 year olds across 55 countries, researchers showed that there was no significant association between reading achievement and school entry age.
This body of evidence raises important and serious questions concerning the direction of travel of early childhood education policy currently in England. In the interests of childrenÃ¢€™s academic achievements and their emotional well-being, the UK government should take this evidence seriously.
- See more at: http://www.cam.ac.uk/research/discussion/school-starting-age-the-evidence#sthash.2M4efzXA.dpuf
INDEX OF RESEARCH THAT COUNTS